> On Sun, 06 Sep 2020, David Seifert wrote:
> On Sun, 2020-09-06 at 21:49 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Maybe just commit the new eclass, update ebuilds, then remove the
>> function from eutils?
> I'll get a lot of heat for breaking EAPI 2 ebuilds in some random
> abandoned overlay because
On Sun, 2020-09-06 at 21:49 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, 06 Sep 2020, David Seifert wrote:
> > @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ _EUTILS_ECLASS=1
> > # implicitly inherited (now split) eclasses
> > case ${EAPI:-0} in
> > 0|1|2|3|4|5|6)
> > - inherit desktop epatch estack ltprune multilib p
> On Sun, 06 Sep 2020, David Seifert wrote:
> @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ _EUTILS_ECLASS=1
> # implicitly inherited (now split) eclasses
> case ${EAPI:-0} in
> 0|1|2|3|4|5|6)
> - inherit desktop epatch estack ltprune multilib preserve-libs \
> + inherit desktop epatch estack ltprune multilib
Signed-off-by: David Seifert
---
eclass/eutils.eclass | 49 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 47 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/eutils.eclass b/eclass/eutils.eclass
index 20dec774f2f..4255056f310 100644
--- a/eclass/eutils.eclass
+++ b/eclass/eutils.
