On Mon, Nov 27, 2023 at 08:08:40AM +0800, Benda Xu wrote:
> Hi Yiyang,
>
> Yiyang Wu writes:
>
> > Upstream usually ships 2 version: gfx90a:xnack-, gfx90a:xnack+. Although
> > a single gfx90a should have maximum compatibility, According to [1,2],
> > compile with xnack+/xnack- may have better pe
Hi Yiyang,
Yiyang Wu writes:
> Upstream usually ships 2 version: gfx90a:xnack-, gfx90a:xnack+. Although
> a single gfx90a should have maximum compatibility, According to [1,2],
> compile with xnack+/xnack- may have better performance on xnack
> enabled/disabled GPUs. Therefore we ship both the t
MI210 is xnack disabled by default. Compile with :xnack+ will produce
GPU kernels that cannot be run on MI210.
Two targets, gfx90a_xnack and gfx90a_noxnack are introduced to replace
gfx90a, for the following reason:
Upstream usually ships 2 version: gfx90a:xnack-, gfx90a:xnack+. Although
a single
