Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/30] One batch of Python eclass updates to rule them all

2022-02-09 Thread Michał Górny
On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 07:34 +, Sam James wrote: > While we're meddling with the eclassses, could we consider fixing > the 'locale' calls on musl? musl guarantees a UTF 8 locale (I _think_ > C.UTF-8) but the current eclass logic leads to log spam as the command > doesn't exist on musl systems.

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/30] One batch of Python eclass updates to rule them all

2022-02-09 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 2/9/2022 02:34, Sam James wrote: [snip] > > While we're meddling with the eclassses, could we consider fixing > the 'locale' calls on musl? musl guarantees a UTF 8 locale (I _think_ > C.UTF-8) but the current eclass logic leads to log spam as the command > doesn't exist on musl systems. > > be

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/30] One batch of Python eclass updates to rule them all

2022-02-08 Thread Sam James
On Sun, 6 Feb 2022 13:48:11 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > Here's the largest batch of eclass updates in quite some time. They > combine some new features needed for PEP 517 packages, other new > features, refactoring, cleanup and cosmetic changes -- hopefully > to stop the cache updates

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 00/30] One batch of Python eclass updates to rule them all

2022-02-06 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, Here's the largest batch of eclass updates in quite some time. They combine some new features needed for PEP 517 packages, other new features, refactoring, cleanup and cosmetic changes -- hopefully to stop the cache updates for some time. The changes can be also reviewed on GitHub, particula