Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-09-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 5 Sep 2016 07:47:53 -0400 Joshua Kinard wrote: > On 07/09/2016 17:01, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hello, everyone. > > > > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup > > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages > > to make it possible to use it withou

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-09-05 Thread Joshua Kinard
On 07/09/2016 17:01, Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages > to make it possible to use it without having to hack their mistaken > logic around. > > The profile is c

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-09-03 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 9 Jul 2016 23:01:24 +0200 Michał Górny wrote: > Hello, everyone. > > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages > to make it possible to use it without having to hack their mistaken > logic around. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-07-12 Thread Michał Górny
On Tue, 12 Jul 2016 07:29:08 +0200 Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > > > I didn't initially wanted to do the profile either but some > > developers have refused to support this 'unsupported configuration'. > > I assume that having an official profile will

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-07-11 Thread Ulrich Mueller
> On Mon, 11 Jul 2016, Michał Górny wrote: > I didn't initially wanted to do the profile either but some > developers have refused to support this 'unsupported configuration'. > I assume that having an official profile will ensure better > cooperation. IMHO we should create additional profile

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-07-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:33:54 -0400 > Mike Gilbert wrote: > >> On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: >> > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup >> > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system p

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-07-11 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 11 Jul 2016 12:33:54 -0400 Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup > > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages > > to make it possible to use it without having to ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-07-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Sat, Jul 9, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup > in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages > to make it possible to use it without having to hack their mistaken > logic around. The baselayout and glibc chang

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/4] New no-lib-symlink profile for developers

2016-07-09 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. I've finally gotten around to wrapping up my multilib setup in a profile, and providing necessary patches to system packages to make it possible to use it without having to hack their mistaken logic around. The profile is called 'no-lib-symlink', and is provided as an alternate a