> On Fri, 13 Aug 2021, David Seifert wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 19:50 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>> Interesting. You don't even now my view on this but you already have
>> an opinion and are saying that I am the culprit. I think this is
>> called "prejudiced".
> To this day, we're s
On Mon, 2021-08-09 at 19:50 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2021-08-08 13:17, David Seifert wrote:
> > So you've created a big commotion... because you didn't get the
> > initial
> > point? Honestly, this seems to be a recurring theme at this point.
> > Someone suggests some improved check/so
On 2021-08-08 13:17, David Seifert wrote:
So you've created a big commotion... because you didn't get the initial
point? Honestly, this seems to be a recurring theme at this point.
Someone suggests some improved check/some change, and nowadays you can
bet 50 quid that Whissi will pop up and bikes
On Wed, 2021-08-04 at 14:35 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> On 2021-08-04 04:56, Sam James wrote:
> > Sure, thanks for the clarification. It's deprecated in the sense of
> > ebuilds installing to it though, right?
>
> Well, it triggered me because saying it's deprecated implies two
> things
>
On Wed, Aug 4, 2021 at 5:35 AM Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-04 04:56, Sam James wrote:
> > Sure, thanks for the clarification. It's deprecated in the sense of
> > ebuilds installing to it though, right?
>
> Well, it triggered me because saying it's deprecated implies two things
> for m
On Tue, Aug 3, 2021 at 7:56 PM Sam James wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 4 Aug 2021, at 03:39, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
> >
> > On 2021-08-01 01:56, Sam James wrote:
> >> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
> >> is a deprecated location;
> >
> > This location is _not_ depreca
On 2021-08-04 04:56, Sam James wrote:
Sure, thanks for the clarification. It's deprecated in the sense of
ebuilds installing to it though, right?
Well, it triggered me because saying it's deprecated implies two things
for me:
1) It was OK for packages to do that in the past
2) Something has
> On 4 Aug 2021, at 03:39, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
> On 2021-08-01 01:56, Sam James wrote:
>> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
>> is a deprecated location;
>
> This location is _not_ deprecated.
>
> This is the location for the local system administrator
On 2021-08-01 01:56, Sam James wrote:
1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
is a deprecated location;
This location is _not_ deprecated.
This is the location for the local system administrator to override
tmpfiles.d specifications installed by packages which shou
On Monday, August 2, 2021 1:30:07 AM PDT Michał Górny wrote:
> On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 01:28 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> > it can actually check if ebuild calls tmpfiles_process, not only
> > inherit.
> > something like:
> >
> > local pkg_postinst_body="$(declare -fp pkg_postinst)"
> > i
On Mon, 2021-08-02 at 01:28 -0700, Georgy Yakovlev wrote:
> it can actually check if ebuild calls tmpfiles_process, not only
> inherit.
> something like:
>
> local pkg_postinst_body="$(declare -fp pkg_postinst)"
> if [[ ! ${pkg_postinst_body} == *tmpfiles_process* ]]; then
> eqawar
On Saturday, July 31, 2021 4:56:34 PM PDT Sam James wrote:
> This adds two tmpfiles related QA checks:
> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
> is a deprecated location;
>
> 2) Check whether packages inherit tmpfiles.eclass if they're
> installing files to /usr/lib/t
On Sun, Aug 1, 2021 at 1:24 PM Sam James wrote:
>
>
>
> > On 1 Aug 2021, at 17:42, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> >
> > On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 7:56 PM Sam James wrote:
> >>
> >> This adds two tmpfiles related QA checks:
> >> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
> >> is a d
> On 1 Aug 2021, at 17:42, Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 7:56 PM Sam James wrote:
>>
>> This adds two tmpfiles related QA checks:
>> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
>> is a deprecated location;
>
> sys-apps/systemd calls keepdir /etc/tmpf
On Sat, Jul 31, 2021 at 7:56 PM Sam James wrote:
>
> This adds two tmpfiles related QA checks:
> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
> is a deprecated location;
sys-apps/systemd calls keepdir /etc/tmpfiles.d so that users don't get
confused by a missing directory.
On Sun, 2021-08-01 at 00:56 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> This adds two tmpfiles related QA checks:
> 1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
> is a deprecated location;
>
> 2) Check whether packages inherit tmpfiles.eclass if they're
> installing files to /usr/lib/tmpfiles
This adds two tmpfiles related QA checks:
1) Verify packages don't install tmpfiles to /etc/tmpfiles.d, which
is a deprecated location;
2) Check whether packages inherit tmpfiles.eclass if they're
installing files to /usr/lib/tmpfiles.d.
(This helps to catch packages not calling tmpfiles_process
17 matches
Mail list logo
