On Sun, 2023-02-19 at 18:32 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> +Abstract
> +
> +
> +A new ``TEST_SUITE_PRESENT`` variable is introduced to indicate whether
> +the package features a test suite. It can be set either by the ebuild,
> +the eclass or the default ``src_test`` implementation, and afte
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 3:11 PM Maciej Barć wrote:
>
> What if developer configured an ebuild in a way that it downloads the
> test suite/files/data with USE=test?
>
> IMO it should be added to the GLEP that then TEST_SUITE_PRESENT should
> be true (exists).
This is what I was afraid of with the
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 12:42 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> How about using a new token in PROPERTIES instead?
I don't see how you could alter PROPERTIES at runtime, or how you'd
express three possible outcomes with a binary flag.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
How about using a new token in PROPERTIES instead?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> On 20 Feb 2023, at 08:37, Florian Schmaus wrote:
>
> On 19/02/2023 18.32, Michał Górny wrote:
>> +Abstract
>> +
>> +
>> +A new ``TEST_SUITE_PRESENT`` variable is introduced to indicate whether
>> +the package features a test suite.
> I wonder if we could not simply use IUSE="test" for
On 19/02/2023 18.32, Michał Górny wrote:
+Abstract
+
+
+A new ``TEST_SUITE_PRESENT`` variable is introduced to indicate whether
+the package features a test suite.
I wonder if we could not simply use IUSE="test" for this purpose? That
is, allow declaring the 'test' use flag, even though
On Mon, 2023-02-20 at 00:10 +0100, Maciej Barć wrote:
> What if developer configured an ebuild in a way that it downloads the
> test suite/files/data with USE=test?
>
> IMO it should be added to the GLEP that then TEST_SUITE_PRESENT should
> be true (exists).
>
How does that change anything?
What if developer configured an ebuild in a way that it downloads the
test suite/files/data with USE=test?
IMO it should be added to the GLEP that then TEST_SUITE_PRESENT should
be true (exists).
W dniu 19.02.2023 o 18:32, Michał Górny pisze:
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-.ebui
On Sun, Feb 19, 2023 at 9:32 AM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> glep-.ebuild | 132 +++
> 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 glep-.ebuild
>
> diff --git a/glep-.ebuild b/glep-.ebuild
> ne
Hi,
Michał Górny writes:
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> glep-.ebuild | 132 +++
> 1 file changed, 132 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 glep-.ebuild
>
> diff --git a/glep-.ebuild b/glep-.ebuild
> new file mode 100644
> index
On Sun, 2023-02-19 at 22:35 +0500, Anna (cybertailor) Vyalkova wrote:
> Is it better than
>
> RESTRICT="test"
>
> ?
Yes. RESTRICT=test is only workable if everyone reliably set it on all
ebuilds not having any tests.
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
Is it better than
RESTRICT="test"
?
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
glep-.ebuild | 132 +++
1 file changed, 132 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 glep-.ebuild
diff --git a/glep-.ebuild b/glep-.ebuild
new file mode 100644
index 000..9ee18ca
--- /dev/null
+++ b/glep-999
13 matches
Mail list logo
