Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-11 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Tue, Nov 6, 2012 at 5:40 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring wrote: >> > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop >> > the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-10 Thread IAN DELANEY
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012 14:40:19 -0800 Brian Harring wrote: > On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring > > wrote: > > > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor > > > stop the efforts to dig us out of the p

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Brian Harring
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:31:07PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop > > the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, *this > > time around* that eclass shoul

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 7:48 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:54:45PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Brian Harring wrote: >> > This isn't quite what I'm asking for. I want y'all to literally >> > document thus: >> > >> > 1) What your finished so

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le mardi 06 novembre 2012 à 14:13 +0100, Gilles Dartiguelongue a écrit : [snip] Forgot to add that obviously, as already explained by Michał, distutils-r1 being (almost) the only demo out there to make use of this new eclass, most the of little things that would make it a success may still be miss

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-06 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 05 novembre 2012 à 16:48 -0800, Brian Harring a écrit : > > Either way, I'm honestly not trying to piss folks off here nor stop > the efforts to dig us out of the python.eclass mess. That said, > *this > time around* that eclass should actually have a plan so that we don't > wind up i

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 06:54:45PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > > This isn't quite what I'm asking for. I want y'all to literally > > document thus: > > > > 1) What your finished solution is going to look like. Users control > > which implem

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 6:34 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:50:24PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: >> On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Brian Harring wrote: >> > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:15:45PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote: >> >> And in case anyone wondered, the output looks lik

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 05:50:24PM -0500, Mike Gilbert wrote: > On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:15:45PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > >> And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this: > >> > >> * PYTHON_TARGETS <-> USE_PYTHON inconsis

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Mike Gilbert
On Mon, Nov 5, 2012 at 5:25 PM, Brian Harring wrote: > On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:15:45PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote: >> And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this: >> >> * PYTHON_TARGETS <-> USE_PYTHON inconsistency found. This may result >> * in missing modules when trying to use

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Brian Harring
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 01:15:45PM +0100, Micha?? G??rny wrote: > And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this: > > * PYTHON_TARGETS <-> USE_PYTHON inconsistency found. This may result > * in missing modules when trying to use Python packages. Please ensure > * that the same implemen

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Michał Górny
On Mon, 05 Nov 2012 13:43:50 +0100 Gilles Dartiguelongue wrote: > Le lundi 05 novembre 2012 à 13:15 +0100, Michał Górny a écrit : > > And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this: > > > > * PYTHON_TARGETS <-> USE_PYTHON inconsistency found. This may result > > * in missing modules w

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Gilles Dartiguelongue
Le lundi 05 novembre 2012 à 13:15 +0100, Michał Górny a écrit : > And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this: > > * PYTHON_TARGETS <-> USE_PYTHON inconsistency found. This may result > * in missing modules when trying to use Python packages. Please ensure > * that the same implemen

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Michał Górny
And in case anyone wondered, the output looks like this: * PYTHON_TARGETS <-> USE_PYTHON inconsistency found. This may result * in missing modules when trying to use Python packages. Please ensure * that the same implementations are listed in both variables. * * Implementation python2_5 disa

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Check for USE_PYTHON <-> PYTHON_TARGETS equiv.

2012-11-05 Thread Michał Górny
--- gx86/eclass/python-r1.eclass | 66 1 file changed, 66 insertions(+) diff --git a/gx86/eclass/python-r1.eclass b/gx86/eclass/python-r1.eclass index 0d6ef4c..6d4eb33 100644 --- a/gx86/eclass/python-r1.eclass +++ b/gx86/eclass/python-r1.eclass @@ -363