Doug Goldstein wrote:
> > What is the benefit?
> >
> > Regards,
> >
> There is none really. Allow all use flags to exist in metadata.xml. It's
> really more of a clarification to the GLEP if this is allowed.
Agreed, it has no benefit at all plus would lead to some kind of useless
duplication o
On 13:11 Wed 13 Aug , Doug Goldstein wrote:
> Further questions regarding use.desc have come up with regard to this
> GLEP. My proposed solution would be a potential amendment to the GLEP to
> state that
>
>
>
> Would be allowed. This syntax is not actually disallowed or allowed by
> the
Jeroen Roovers wrote:
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:13:26 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
What is the benefit?
There is none really. Allow all use flags to exist in metadata.xml.
It's really more of a clarification to the GLEP if this is allowed.
[1] Come t
On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:13:26 -0400
Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What is the benefit?
> There is none really. Allow all use flags to exist in metadata.xml.
> It's really more of a clarification to the GLEP if this is allowed.
I personally think that this would facilitate a lot of
Josh Saddler wrote:
> XML doesn't put a space between the attribute and the closing slash --
> XHTML does. Common mistake. Also, use " for attributes, rather than '.
Nope, both is perfectly legal in XML (and illegal per the GDP coding
style, which certainly doesn't apply to metadata.xml) :p.
Chee
Santiago M. Mola wrote:
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Howdy all,
Further questions regarding use.desc have come up with regard to this GLEP.
My proposed solution would be a potential amendment to the GLEP to state
that
Would be allowed. This sy
Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> If you're going for proper XML, then it should look like this:
>
>
>
> XML doesn't put a space between the attribute and the closing slash --
> XHTML does. Common mistake. Also, use " for attributes, rather than '.
Well, if we want to nitpick, adding a sp
Doug Goldstein wrote:
Howdy all,
Further questions regarding use.desc have come up with regard to this
GLEP. My proposed solution would be a potential amendment to the GLEP to
state that
Comments, Suggestions, Input are all welcome.
If you're going for proper XML, then it should look l
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 7:11 PM, Doug Goldstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Howdy all,
>
> Further questions regarding use.desc have come up with regard to this GLEP.
> My proposed solution would be a potential amendment to the GLEP to state
> that
>
>
>
> Would be allowed. This syntax is not act
Howdy all,
Further questions regarding use.desc have come up with regard to this
GLEP. My proposed solution would be a potential amendment to the GLEP to
state that
Would be allowed. This syntax is not actually disallowed or allowed by
the current GLEP, but mentioning it would allow a meta
10 matches
Mail list logo
