On Sat, 2019-12-21 at 08:21 +1300, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:54:44 -0500
> Mike Gilbert wrote:
>
> > Yes, I think you misunderstand something, but I'm not sure exactly how.
>
> I think the missing part of my understanding might be that IDEPEND
> needs to be satisfied by:
>
>
On Fri, 20 Dec 2019 13:54:44 -0500
Mike Gilbert wrote:
> Yes, I think you misunderstand something, but I'm not sure exactly how.
I think the missing part of my understanding might be that IDEPEND
needs to be satisfied by:
- Packages installing binpkg's ( which don't need src_fetch, unpack, etc
On Fri, Dec 20, 2019 at 1:41 PM Kent Fredric wrote:
>
> On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:40:26 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > The proposal is to add a new dependency type (codename: IDEPEND) which
> > indicates dependencies used for pkg_*inst (and pkg_*rm?) phases
>
> Given the nature of this, I somewha
On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 20:40:26 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> The proposal is to add a new dependency type (codename: IDEPEND) which
> indicates dependencies used for pkg_*inst (and pkg_*rm?) phases
Given the nature of this, I somewhat expect this to cover dependencies
required for src_unpack and src
On Fri, 2019-12-20 at 18:55 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> > Should we use this to drop RDEPEND from pkg_*inst/rm phases ?
> > PMS states "RDEPEND (unless the particular dependency results in a
> > circular dependency, in which case it may be i
> On Fri, 20 Dec 2019, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> Should we use this to drop RDEPEND from pkg_*inst/rm phases ?
> PMS states "RDEPEND (unless the particular dependency results in a
> circular dependency, in which case it may be installed later)" which is
> kind of "maybe maybe not" and I'm not su
On Thu, 2019-12-19 at 20:40 +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Here's another potential EAPI 8 feature I'd like to discuss. Please
> note that this is about *new dependency type*, so please don't hijack
> it
> into the big 'let's steal Exherbo syntax' debate.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.or
On Thu, Dec 19, 2019 at 2:40 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> Here's another potential EAPI 8 feature I'd like to discuss. Please
> note that this is about *new dependency type*, so please don't hijack it
> into the big 'let's steal Exherbo syntax' debate.
>
> Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/66
Hello,
Here's another potential EAPI 8 feature I'd like to discuss. Please
note that this is about *new dependency type*, so please don't hijack it
into the big 'let's steal Exherbo syntax' debate.
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/660306
The problem
===
Right now we don't really have a cl
