Re: [gentoo-dev] /lib/modprobe.d vs. /etc/modprobe.d

2013-01-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
On 27/01/13 18:00, Rich Freeman wrote: On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: I see a lot of packages installing /etc/modprobe.d when it should be treated like /etc/udev, so only generated files and users own files On a related note, I just noticed that /etc/udev is loaded w

Re: [gentoo-dev] /lib/modprobe.d vs. /etc/modprobe.d

2013-01-27 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sun, Jan 27, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Samuli Suominen wrote: > I see a lot of packages installing /etc/modprobe.d when it should be treated > like /etc/udev, so only generated files and users own files On a related note, I just noticed that /etc/udev is loaded with orphans in my case, and I can't ima

[gentoo-dev] /lib/modprobe.d vs. /etc/modprobe.d

2013-01-27 Thread Samuli Suominen
I see a lot of packages installing /etc/modprobe.d when it should be treated like /etc/udev, so only generated files and users own files I'm suggesting converting ebuilds to install into /lib/modprobe.d and then tell users to copy it to /etc/modprobe.d for editing and replacing the run of the