On Monday 08 February 2010 06:15:38 Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the "X" USE flag and instead only have
> "gtk", "qt" and the like. This should be declared absolutely wrong,
> IMHO. When a program provides a command-line tool and a GUI tool, and
> the GUI tool uses o
On 02/08/2010 01:30 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
> Dne 8.2.2010 12:15, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a):
>> Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
>> like whining :P
>
>> A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the "X" USE flag and instead only have
>> "gtk", "qt" and the like. Thi
On 08/02/10 11:15, Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
> like whining :P
>
> A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the "X" USE flag and instead only have
> "gtk", "qt" and the like. This should be declared absolutely wrong,
> IMHO. When a p
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dne 8.2.2010 12:15, Nikos Chantziaras napsal(a):
> Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
> like whining :P
>
> A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the "X" USE flag and instead only have
> "gtk", "qt" and the like. This sh
Hello. Please don't be too harsh if I got this wrong or if this looks
like whining :P
A lot of ebuilds seem to ignore the "X" USE flag and instead only have
"gtk", "qt" and the like. This should be declared absolutely wrong,
IMHO. When a program provides a command-line tool and a GUI tool,
