On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:53 -0700, Alec Warner wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Maybe we should create a new mailing list, say,
> > gentoo-usr-discuss...@lists.gentoo.org.
>
> Just to clarify, you are trolling right?
s/trolling/joking/
It's is not the first tim
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:45 -0500
> William Hubbs wrote:
>
>> All,
>>
>> here is what I see on the current udev situation:
>>
>> The council has made a decision that we will continue supporting
>> split out /usr.
>>
>> This, however, was ne
On Wed, 2012-04-11 at 14:53 -0500, William Hubbs wrote:
> Does this answer any fears about trying to force an untimely
> stabilization?
It certainly helps me sleep at night, yes. Any... inconveniences forced
on me have to be fixed over 40 times.
Regards,
Tony V.
signature.asc
Description: This
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 09:58:47PM +0200, Michał Górny wrote:
> Maybe we should create a new mailing list, say,
> gentoo-usr-discuss...@lists.gentoo.org.
No. I'm on enough mailing lists as is. :-)
William
pgpG9pgrCd8Qa.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Apr 11, 2012 at 3:53 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
> To allay any fears of that happening, I have opened a tracker [1] for
> issues which need to be resolved before newer udevs can go stable.
>
Probably wouldn't hurt for the initramfs maintainers to open a
stablization tracking bug for whateve
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 14:53:45 -0500
William Hubbs wrote:
> All,
>
> here is what I see on the current udev situation:
>
> The council has made a decision that we will continue supporting
> split out /usr.
>
> This, however, was never in question. No one is planning to drop
> support for separa
All,
here is what I see on the current udev situation:
The council has made a decision that we will continue supporting
split out /usr.
This, however, was never in question. No one is planning to drop support
for separate /usr. Also, no one is planning on trying to force
stabilize udev-182 with
