On 8 September 2015 at 03:26, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> And as the cherry on the cake theere could be
>
> <> ( foo/bar-1 foo/bar-5 )
I kinda tried suggesting a similar syntax, but then I realised it
couldn't work, because it implicitly says "none of these" but it
doesn't state any sort of "Pull
* Michał Górny schrieb am 07.09.15 um 17:16 Uhr:
> Dnia 2015-09-07, o godz. 14:35:07
> Marc Schiffbauer napisał(a):
>
> > I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
> >
> > This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
> > you have a dependency on another pack
* Ian Stakenvicius schrieb am 07.09.15 um 16:41 Uhr:
> Why not just:
>
> DEPEND="
> dev-python/paramiko
> !~dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0
> "
>
> Depend on the package but block the individual atom(s) that don't work?
I like it. At least with the current possibilities. I was not aware that
"!~" is
* Kent Fredric schrieb am 07.09.15 um 15:18 Uhr:
> On 8 September 2015 at 00:35, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> > What do you think and would is the proper way to suggest this for a new
> > EAPI? A new bug? On what
>
>
> My opposition would be I figure its more likely you want a range of
> exclusion
* Ulrich Mueller schrieb am 07.09.15 um 15:07 Uhr:
> > On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
>
> > I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
>
> > This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull
> > when you have a dependency on another package but a single
Dnia 2015-09-07, o godz. 14:35:07
Marc Schiffbauer napisał(a):
> I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
>
> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
> you have a dependency on another package but a single version of it is
> not compatible for example
Sent from an iPhone, sorry for the HTML...
> On Sep 7, 2015, at 8:35 AM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
>
> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
> you have a dependency on another package but a si
On 8 September 2015 at 00:35, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> I currently have this case in app-backup/obnam which is not compatible
> to =dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0
>
> In DEPEND I now have this:
>
> !=dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0
> || ( dev-python/paramiko-1.13.0 )
>
> which does the trick, but I th
> On Mon, 7 Sep 2015, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull
> when you have a dependency on another package but a single version
> of it is not compatible for example.
This doesn't lo
On 09/07/2015 02:35 PM, Marc Schiffbauer wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
>
> This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
> you have a dependency on another package but a single version of it is
> not compatible for example.
+1
Hi,
I'd like to propose a new kind of DEPEND syntax: <>
This would mean "Any version but the one specified" and is usefull when
you have a dependency on another package but a single version of it is
not compatible for example.
I currently have this case in app-backup/obnam which is not compat
11 matches
Mail list logo
