[gentoo-dev] Re: Confirm unsubscribe from gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org

On Fri, Dec 20, 2024, at 18:29, gentoo-dev+h...@lists.gentoo.org wrote: > > > Somebody (and we hope it was you) has requested that the email address > be removed from the list. > > To confirm you want to do this, please send a message to > > which

Re: [gentoo-dev] Applying for package maintenance

On Sun, Nov 15, 2020 at 09:15:35AM +, Alexey Sokolov wrote: > 15.11.2020 10:10, Ivan J. пишет: > > Greetings. I am wondering what is the process to apply for maintaining a > > package in the portage tree that has a "mainainer-needed" entry? More > > specificall

[gentoo-dev] Applying for package maintenance

Greetings. I am wondering what is the process to apply for maintaining a package in the portage tree that has a "mainainer-needed" entry? More specifically, I would like to maintain www-client/surf. Thanks, Ivan

Re: [gentoo-dev] My masterplan for git migration (+ looking for infra to test it)

I think the better option Is to block rsync and force emerge-webrsync .sended from a phone Il 14/09/2014 14:03, Michał Górny ha scritto: > The rsync tree > -- > > We'd also propagate things to rsync. We'd have to populate it with old > ChangeLogs, new ChangeLog entries (autogenerated fr

[gentoo-dev] [EMAIL PROTECTED]

w anything like this, for so long period of time. Sorry if I don't understand something --- I'm really a new gentoo-dev reader, but I feel sorry for this brilliant distribution sinking in the darkness of FUD. Please please *do* stop it. Many thanks in advance, -- Ivan -- gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default or not?)

On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 11:55 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 10:44 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:22 +, Edward Catmur wrote: > > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 08:40 -0500, Ned Ludd wrote: > > > > On Sun, 2005-11-27 at 15:09 +0200, Iva

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Split ELF Debug (default or not?)

27;t ( not sure if anyone does ) care about any non-gdb debugger. So, can you give us a wild guess about the disk space ? How much does it take on your system and how many packages do you have installed ? And one more thing. For proper debugging, don't I need the source to be present ? -- Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Split ELF Debug (defult or not?)

le it. It makes sense to able to debug a problem right away rather than having to reemerge things first, to get the debugging info. How much disk space should the debug info consume ? -- Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Bug 80905

On Tue, 2005-09-13 at 14:52 +0100, Daniel Drake wrote: > are running vesafb-tng and have >=1GB RAM then try > turning off vesafb-tng Why ? -- Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] FAQs for maintainer-wanted ebuilds

On Mon, 2005-09-12 at 14:44 +0300, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > On Sun, 2005-09-11 at 22:41 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > > I've put together a kind of FAQ for the most common maintainer-wanted > > problems: > > > > http://dev.gentoo.org/~ciaranm/docs/mw-faq/ > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] FAQs for maintainer-wanted ebuilds

t; licence.txt 11-Sep-2005 22:27 745 license.txt 11-Sep-2005 22:27 745 I guess one should go away. -- Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fixing the TERM mess

;d work much better if terminal could pump its capabilities to the app at runtime, that is during reattachment. Would it be that hard to extend window resize or something? Ivan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Fixing the TERM mess

me the biggest obstacle with terminals is that TERM environment variable can't change during an application runtime, while the terminal can change and, when using screen, often does. Well, I don't know much about this and you seem to be very knowledgeable, so I ask :). Ivan -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] /var/cache

reiserfs ). If you don't want to obliterate the data, your only option is deleting some files. -- Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC - Gentoo on the Lab

ork does he have a choice really ? -- Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package version requiring sse

On Sun, 2005-08-07 at 12:11 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò wrote: > On Sunday 07 August 2005 12:03, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > Well ppc doesn't have SSE Then why is the ppc keyword there ? > but there are many people running Gentoo non machines that does *not* support >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Package version requiring sse

ing ebuild emerge. Given the valgrind-3.0.0 keywords ( -* ~amd64 ~ppc ~x86 ) I guess most people on those arches have SSE anyway. AFAIK all amd64's have SSE, I don't know about ppc, and I doubt anyone is running Gentoo on i686. You should expect a few bugs about it though. -- Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Package version requiring sse

least not with x86 - x86 contains both CPUs like P4 that have SSE and i686 that does not. I am not sure if it is better, but you can cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep flags | grep sse and die if not found. Cheers, Ivan Yosifov. -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

Thanks, Alin. This was the type of constructive response I was hoping to provoke. Don't get me wrong - I like genlop, however software "final state" does not exist IMO, and bugfixing is hugely important with any software. Also, by "dead upstream" I mean that the page does not even exist anymore,

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

Team view on the matter. On Sun, 2005-07-24 at 20:56 -0600, R Hill wrote: > Christian Parpart wrote: > > On Sunday 24 July 2005 20:29, Ivan Yosifov wrote: > >> What's up with genlop ? > >> There are 9 open bugs, some including trivial fixes ( like #97049 ), > >

[gentoo-dev] app-portage/genlop: 9 open bugs, dead upstream

Hello Everyone, What's up with genlop ? There are 9 open bugs, some including trivial fixes ( like #97049 ), the homepage http://pollycoke.org/genlop.html ( as listed in the ebuild ) is dead. If my understanding is correct, unmaintained packages are removed from the tree. Thanks, Ivan Yo