Hello,
On Sun, 25 Apr 2010 13:18:25 +0200
Angelo Arrifano wrote:
> Hello developers developers and developers,
>
> Ever wondered how much crap is left in your X-years old Gentoo box?
>
> I just developed a python utility to efficiently find orphaned files
> in the system. By orphaned files I m
On Wed, 27 Aug 2008 08:10:06 +0200
Ulrich Mueller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Should LICENSE changes require a revision bump?
>
> No, since it would be a waste of users' resources.
>
> For example, if a dev has missed a change from GPL-2 to GPL-3 (which I
> guess is a common case), would you
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 20:17:48 -0600
Ryan Hill <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Should LICENSE changes require a revision bump?
A licence changes what get's installed, ok the files are the same, but
the meaning of having the same files is different. So I say yes.
> It kinda seems to me the answer shou
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 15:25:16 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:57:50PM -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> > > Why do you need to identify the changes? Considering that the
> > > checksum changes as well, is
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 14:45:25 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:59:09PM -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> > > Err, what do you mean by revision dump?
> > revision dump is when foo-1.0-r4 becomes foo-1.0-r5.
> That&
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:54:21 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 03:41:07PM -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> > > I'm doing some research on our usages of the $Header$ keyword in
> > > our main CVS repo.
> &g
Hi,
On Tue, 26 Aug 2008 13:40:36 -0700
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm doing some research on our usages of the $Header$ keyword in our
> main CVS repo.
>
> Q: Are there any other use-cases you have and actively use?
I use the revision present in the header to identify chang
Hello All,
I will be adding some debian build tools to the tree, and would like to
create the debtools herd to associate with the packages.
I'll be adding things like debhelper, lintian and a little
bit later things like apt, aptitude, cdebootstrap, debian-live and some more.
Also there is deboot
On Mon, 28 Jan 2008 07:23:18 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> now that the mktemp binary has been moved out of debianutils and
> integrated straight into coreutils, perhaps it's time to ask how
> important this package is to everyone. current debianutils is part
> of "system" and
Hello,
On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 20:24:53 -0500
Mark Loeser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What exactly do we need this system to do that we can't do now?
The only interesting thing I can think of, is to expose some of the USE
flags logic found in some ebuilds in a parseable fashion.
I'm talking about
On Wed, 25 Apr 2007 23:39:47 +0200
Rémi Cardona <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Grant Goodyear a écrit :
> > Fabian Groffen wrote: [Sat Apr 14 2007, 03:33:03AM CDT]
> >> For people that like reading it in html or via the web:
> >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~grobian/gleps/glep-keywords.html
> >> http://de
On Fri, 20 Apr 2007 14:52:46 +0200
Fabian Groffen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 20-04-2007 15:45:00 +0300, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > > I use it to make deltas of changes made in the tree, and apply
> > > those deltas on the overlay I'm using. Without $Header: $ there
> > > I have no way to actual
On Mon, 12 Mar 2007 16:36:03 -0700
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And matches "$(which "
> x11-misc/xoo/xoo-0.7.ebuild:25:
Fixed.
Best wishes,
Yuri.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 23:31:04 +0100
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 December 2006 22:53, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> > While for the ones that support v2 or later (this is actually a
> > special case of multiple licen
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 17:06:32 -0500
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100
> > "Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>
Hi,
On Fri, 22 Dec 2006 21:56:54 +0100
"Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> At the moment we represent the software we consider under GNU General
> Public License, version 2 of the license, but we cannot be sure it's
> alright to license it to "any later version". Linux kernel
Hello,
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 17:32:41 +0300
Alexander Zubkov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi!
> I have some idea on extending portage building system (ebuild?).
> Sometimes I'm (for example) want to apply custom patch to some
> package. This patch can do something unusual, that can not be
> accepte
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 13:28:22 -0800
"Robin H. Johnson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 18, 2006 at 02:53:56PM -0600, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
> > This will make the script a little bit slower, but it should not be
> > that hard to integrate.
> Please read t
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 11:38:14 -0500
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I think it should also include the Homepage(s) and Description of
> > the packages so readers could easily check what that additions are
> > all about. While I'm not that sure that additions date and probably
> > wh
Hi,
On Mon, 18 Dec 2006 10:02:00 -0500
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sun, 2006-12-17 at 23:20 -0800, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > The attached list notes all of the packages that were added or
> > removed from the tree, for the week ending 2006-12-17 23h59 UTC.
>
> OK. Here's
On Sat, 4 Nov 2006 06:46:02 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Saturday 04 November 2006 06:14, Petteri Räty wrote:
> > Zac Medico kirjoitti:
> > > What do people think about these two approaches? Personally, I
> > > would prefer approach #2 for the sake of simplicity and
> > >
Hi,
On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 19:58:09 +0100
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Oct 2006 20:42:14 +0200 Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | > Someone needs to implement the foo; however.
> |
> | (Not on cvs, but on a normal tree, but maybe works on cvs. There is
> a |
Hello,
After seeing "Upcoming package removals", for couple of weeks now, in
GWN I'm beginning to think that I would like to see also a list of new
packages added to portage next to the list of packages to be removed.
This will give a better view on the actual state of portage tree, as
well as, wi
Hi,
On Fri, 30 Dec 2005 17:34:59 -0500
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> just a heads up ... i'm going to be adding the ca-certificates package as a
> PDEPEND to the openssl package so most everyone in Gentoo will end up with it
> on their system
>
> for those wondering what this is:
Hi,
On Sat, 13 Aug 2005 18:01:05 -0700
Stefan Jones <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So I have started making a small C program which does the
> "Checking dynamic linking consistency..." part of the revdep-rebuild
> program (I think this the the most time intensive part).
I think it'll be better/pre
Hi,
On Sat, 06 Aug 2005 20:04:20 +0300
Ivan Yosifov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am not sure if it is better, but you can
> cat /proc/cpuinfo | grep flags | grep sse
> and die if not found.
This will make packages dependant on the build system,
which will create inconsistencies in binary gen
Hi,
On Thu, 16 Jun 2005 12:40:39 -0500
Brian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rafael Espíndola wrote:
> > I am using Gentoo to build some small systems. While things like the
> > minimal useflag is a joy, the monolithic nature of most gentoo
> > packages is a headache.
> >
> > Kde has been s
Hi,
On Sat, 04 Jun 2005 14:48:18 -0400
Aaron Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I want to know how to make ebuilds (please if you could send me the web
> > site that explains it),
>
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/handbook.xml
>
> > I suggest you to make an ebuild for wxmaxi
28 matches
Mail list logo
