Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

> On Mar 30, 2015, at 11:55 AM, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > >>>>>> On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Alexandre Rostovtsev wrote: > >>>> On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: >>>>> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak b

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

> On Mar 30, 2015, at 10:18 AM, Alexandre Rostovtsev > wrote: > > On Mon, 2015-03-30 at 09:54 -0500, Tom Gall wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears >> that someone went out and did some del

[gentoo-dev] arm64 profile deletes?

Hi All, Sorry for the trouble. My cvs history foo is a little weak but it appears that someone went out and did some deleting in profiles/arch/arm64 of some WIP things without bothering to email, irc or otherwise communicate. A) Could the guilty party come forward? B) If there was something ob

[gentoo-dev] arm64 Mar 2nd update

I’ve put my experimental stage3 and portage snapshot in my dev space. See: http://dev.gentoo.org/~tgall For this week plan to test install stage3 on the HiKey and start to get the handbook updated in the wiki. We’ll end up with an img that can be dd’ed to sd medi

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update

Thanks for doing that Yixun, I’ll start on your list a little bit later this evening. Best, Tom > On Mar 1, 2015, at 7:49 PM, Yixun Lan wrote: > > On 14:27 Wed 18 Feb , Tom Gall wrote: >> So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board >&

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64 update

> On Feb 18, 2015, at 2:32 PM, C Bergström wrote: > > > > On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 3:27 AM, Tom Gall <mailto:tg...@gentoo.org>> wrote: > So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is > going to start shipping in March for ~$129.

[gentoo-dev] arm64 update

So first, for those interested in cheap arm64 hardware, the first 96 board is going to start shipping in March for ~$129. The HiKey board is an 8 way 64 bit ARM board with 8 A53 cores. (No A57s bummer!) Only had a gig of memory on the board but it’s not a bad device. I’ve had one for about 2-3

Re: [gentoo-dev] arm64

Least speaking for myself I can help you out starting Feb 15th, presuming all the stars are in alignment. If someone else doesn’t help you before, please mark it on your calendar and bug me again then cause I’m sure I’ll forget! Best, Tom > On Jan 25, 2015, at 11:43 AM, Sebastian Pipping wrot

[gentoo-dev] arm64

Hi All, This is sort of a CFP in some ways but not quite that formal. I’ve been throttled back on arm64 for a bit as the hardware I’ve had access to has all been painfully remote and configured in ways that was less than optimal for massive key wording efforts. That’s about to change. So if

[gentoo-dev] Re: Clarifying if some arch teams allows maintainers to stabilize package on arches they can test

As one of the few people working on ARM64 I’m in agreement. Sure a bug or two is probably going to pop up on account of the change but in the grand scheme this seems like a good move. On Jul 27, 2014, at 10:43 AM, Rick Zero_Chaos Farina wrote: > Signed PGP part > On 07/27/2014 09:55 AM, Pach