Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
...adb-database-restore-maybe-required.en.txt | 45 +++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required/2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
...adb-database-restore-maybe-required.en.txt | 45 +++
1 file changed, 45 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required/2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe
re is some discussion for such a feature for 10.7
(probably too late) or 10.8).
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
. We can still last-rite next
quarter, not?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
And forcefully here refers to the undesirable result (at least that was
my intention). Something the user doesn't want.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
efore next week and has to do a full
restore, that user will lose about one week of data...
Just saying.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/825234
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
...adb-database-restore-maybe-required.en.txt | 46 +++
1 file changed, 46 insertions(+)
create mode 100644
2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe-required/2021-11-23-mariadb-database-restore-maybe
ers there is _no_ easy way back anymore.
Any blow up will probably require user to reinstall their entire system...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
de path"...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
lated) use case, feel free to unmask them on your system.
- sys-libs/glibc-2.32-r7::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
- virtual/perl-Pod-Parser-1.630.0-r8::gentoo (masked by: package.mask)
/var/db/repos/gentoo/profiles/package.mask:
# Andreas K. Hüttel (2021-10-16)
# Outdated virtual; the respecti
eived good feedback and is accepted by users
and didn't cause any problems (can't remember that we ever got GLSA
feedback for other architectures than amd64 or x86).
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_s
le architectures by default.
[1]
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-dev/message/a3c7a6cb7596a5ff9102e4d819a52d9c
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
We have that Gentoo Vulnerability Treatment Policy and HPPA isn't listed
in supported architectures. That problem was resolved in 2018 [1].
[1]
https://archives.gentoo.org/gentoo-announce/message/196e45cde209d1ed25bd42e679739cf5
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr:
to expect to change by this
keyword change and why you want to change current status at all
(motivation).
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ow my view on this but you already have an
opinion and are saying that I am the culprit. I think this is called
"prejudiced". I am pretty sure that as a ComRel member you will abstain
from this case as you seem to be superior. I mean you are publicly
attacking me for 10+ months, rejected
that's the
idea of having such a check: To notice something like that, just in case ;-)
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
which should install
below /usr.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
adata/news/2021-07-23-libxcrypt-migration/2021-07-23-libxcrypt-migration.en.txt
# emerge -p mail-mta/postfix
[...]
> * IMPORTANT: 1 news items need reading for repository 'gentoo'.
> * Use eselect news read to view new items.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Dev
On 2021-07-25 08:27, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sun, 2021-07-25 at 01:12 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
I don't understand. Isn't it the same motion we put down just 2
months ago [1]? Or is this something new?
If this isn't something new, what has changed since May [2]?
Appare
//bugs.gentoo.org/784710
[2] https://projects.gentoo.org/council/meeting-logs/20210509.txt
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
more like a policy which is more likely to
cause more stale packages/ignored bugs assuming these maintainer didn't
do that for fun or wilful ignorance. At the moment, the whole idea of
creating a policy for that problem sounds like shooting sparrows with
cannons. But maybe I am missing some
c9
[2]
https://www.gentoo.org/support/security/vulnerability-treatment-policy.html
[3] https://devmanual.gentoo.org/function-reference/install-functions/
[4] https://bugs.gentoo.org/704914
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Security Team
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D
On 2021-07-07 05:05, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jul 6, 2021 at 7:41 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
As you probably know, I am not a Linux desktop user (yet). My complete
experience with that PaX stuff is limited to servers.
Maybe I've misunderstood what you meant. You don't use Li
On 2021-06-23 08:43, Matt Turner wrote:
On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 3:19 PM Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
The PaX community in Gentoo is still big and active.
Many Gentoo users received free access to upstream sources or became
paying customers.
It's just not available for everyone for free/wi
tatus of PaX support in
the packages listed above?
I can only speak for icedtea and nodejs which are working fine.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
at.
Gentoo is done with freenode, we migrated away. There is no need for us
take additional actions against freenode.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ing to far.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
# Tomáš Mózes (2021-06-10)
# Based on unsupported grub-legacy, replaced by
# pvgrub2.
# Removal on 2021-07-08. Bug #790668.
app-emulation/xen-pvgrub
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description
B in patch releases,
such as the removal of the client-server architecture and the SQL API
between 18.1.32 and 18.1.40.
This paragraph doesn't belong into a news item.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_
PS: Even Debian is mentioning "to follow systemd" when they updated
their tzdata package end of 2015, https://bugs.debian.org/803144.
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
his matter? I doubt that systemd will even think about removing what I
believe to be a false warning when systemd detects that /etc/localtime
is a regular file. So let's focus on dealing with the fallout...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2
without mentioning a reason.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
build-time if you are going to
support that) or add reference to [2] again.>
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
retain old, well established behavior across all
slotable packages anymore.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
mysql project will take this package.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
administrator to disable modification of any existing user.
Note: Lock/unlock when acct-* package will be installed/removed
will still happen.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
v3:
- Fixed eclass documentation
- Honor 80 chars limit
- Prefixed internal variable
_ACCT_USER_ALREADY_EXISTS?
Then _ACCT_USER_ALREADY_EXISTS would deviate from ACCT_USER_NAME which
has no underscore prefix and is also marked as internal variable.
Or should I fix both?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
administrator to disable modification of any existing user.
Note: Lock/unlock when acct-* package will be installed/removed
will still happen.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
v2: Keep current behavior; Add opt-out
eclass/acct-user.eclass | 25 +
1 file changed
his implementation detail.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
entire GLEP 81 with
something new just because a group believes there is no flaw and
everyone else having problems are doing things wrong so this group is
rejecting any attempts to address the problem?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713
Hi,
please forget my previous mail. I was informed that I misread your mail,
sorry about that!
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ny anymore.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
implementing the
idea outlined by Robin or what Michael said about /etc/users.d and
user-update tool, this is highly appreciated but will probably not
happen anytime soon.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
Hi,
I wonder how you composed this list. If you just checked if there is any
revdep, the check was probably useless:
For example,
dev-libs/cyberjack
is up-to-date, has an active dev as maintainer and is required for any
ReinerSCT chipcard reader.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann
I want it.
And it doesn't matter if I apply the role to a Gentoo, Debian, Ubuntu or
RHEL box... ;)
So I am not blocking ACCT_USER_$foo if anyone really believe it would
help them.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849
ride via environment variable and be able to detect the override to
have them logged.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
able to differentiate
between values set by acct-* ebuild and user override)?
Of course this won't allow something like `ACCT_USER_ID=42 emerge
` but I am not sure if
this is an implementation goal.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1
address my concerns.
But I still wonder if building such a system is worth it... I mean, it
would be nice to have. Maybe we could build upon such a system to do
same for (changed) file permissions...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5
changes won't go live
until you run said users-update command or make use of INSTALL_MASK.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
.
This will improve the overlay situation and can be seen as overall
improvement but it doesn't address any shared concerns nor is it a
replacement for the proposed 'acct-user.eclass: don't modify existing
user by default' patch.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo
to a socket like shown in my memcached/redis example.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2021-01-04 17:30, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
On 2021-01-04 17:28, Michał Górny wrote:
It must be a bug in your version of the eclass. I've just reemerged
acct-group/wheel and to*my great surprise* I'm still there. How
unexpected!
That's why I wrote
> (luckily group
t there is no acct-user/wheel because otherwise this group
would get cleaned (reset), too.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2021-01-04 17:14, Michał Górny wrote:
as long as it spews a big fat ewarn that the user loses the right to
support.
Could you please elaborate this a little bit more? I cannot agree with
the way I understand this at the moment but I might miss your point.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann
hich will add some kind of slap stick to the whole idea.
That's why I am saying that we don't just need an opt-out option, that's
why I am argue that all this stuff has to be opt-in by default. It's
something special and unique in Gentoo.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann
age
group when you remerge acct-user/portage, but if you kill services
because package maintainers are pushing their vision of how to run the
package, it's not.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
ation will be ignored). But
sometimes users are making changes we wouldn't do, not recommend or just
don't understand at first. That all doesn't matter: We have to keep in
mind that these aren't our systems and we have to respect whatever the
user did on their system.
--
Reg
e can opt-in by setting
ACCT_USER_ALLOW_EXISTING_USER_TO_BE_MODIFIED to a non-zero value in
their make.conf.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Deutschmann
---
eclass/acct-user.eclass | 40 ++--
1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/acct-user.e
advance if the chance is high that you have to
spend the same amount of time again before you can finally merge.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Security Team
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
Hi,
I took
> app-backup/tarsnap
--
Regards,
Thomas
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_to_the_keyserver)
That's all I would do to keep as many details out of the specs. But
maybe I am the only one who is so strict about the spec... I am just
saying and asking for comments.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849
7;t belong into
'specs'.
We maybe can talk about adding just a reference link to the Wiki guide
but I don't believe we should add this to GLEP.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Des
Hi,
glad it's now working for you. In the meanwhile we are looking into issues with
the European Gentoo server 😉
> And FWIW this sentence is a little misleading if the SKS refresh
> frequency is zero =)
>
>The SKS keyserver pool can take much longer to replicate over the
>keyserver ne
Hi,
what exactly did you do already?
Did you uploaded to our internal key server? You can only upload through
dev.gentoo.org, see
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:Infrastructure/Generating_GLEP_63_based_OpenPGP_keys#Submit_your_new_key_to_the_keyserver
However, you can pull from this serve
rk in
tmpfiles config. Saying that systemd's implementation is more secure
than OpenTmpfiles' implementation when you are still able to escalate
privileges is very misleading.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
andling -- the service user must only be allowed to
pass through this directory).
PS: Just to avoid any misunderstandings: OpenTmpfiles should of course
try to fix/avoid this problem if possible. Security is a layered process
(like an onion) and having multiple safe-guards is always a good thing.
elease workflows. But yes, you have to get upstream's
attention to implement this.
And it's not just GitHub, don't forget about GitLab and those
self-hosted GitLab instances which often don't support to upload
arbitrary assets...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo
d so in my opinion they were useful
I do not agree with this conclusion. Just because developers didn't
ignore you and spent additional time to understand and try to help like
we normally do when we get reports from inexperienced users, doesn't
mean it was a pleasure...
--
Regards
Hi,
we are aware and are currently look into this.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
openpgp-digital-signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
# Thomas Deutschmann (2020-10-26)
# Depends on net-libs/zeromq-3 which is scheduled for removal.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #741454.
dev-perl/ZMQ-LibZMQ3
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description
# Thomas Deutschmann (2020-10-26)
# Depends on net-libs/zeromq-2 which is scheduled for removal.
# Removal in 30 days. Bug #741454.
dev-perl/ZMQ-LibZMQ2
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description
On 2020-10-10 22:36, Michał Górny wrote:
On Sat, 2020-10-10 at 22:10 +0200, Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
Another example for something that was not thought to the end and
which was rushed and pushed to our users.
You start this mail with an insult to me. Why do you keep doing
this? Do you feel
promising
anything it cannot do.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Security Team
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
29062
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2020-08-10 14:07, Michał Górny wrote:
> ...or a revert of a change made for change's sake.
That's a bold statement for an unambiguous 7-0 decision as seen in
https://bugs.gentoo.org/575718.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5
we would need to talk about ditching eudev in
general...
So for me it still looks like change for change's sake without a real
reason.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e sys-fs/udev?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
elf if we should teach kexec runscript to
return persistent name instead (utilizing lsblk for example) but this
will raises question like what to do if tools aren't available and maybe
user's start environment can't even handle root=UUID=... value :/
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann /
nformation and believe that avoiding that has much more
value than avoid a problem like an unbootable system for just a few
people (and for headless/servers this is a major problem in case you
cannot trigger remote reboot)... ¯\_(ツ)_/¯
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD
t that uncommon) you maybe
also appending additional root argument which has the potential to cause
boot failures in case you are using non-permanent device names and
something will be different in start environment.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5
el issue, so displaying that only for
people who have genkernel installed would miss a bunch of users.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
e channels. So if this will help
someone who didn't read documentation before or just didn't realize the
obvious risk he/she is taking when using non-persistent names ("It
worked that way for me past 15 years!") I believe it has served its purpose.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann
Hi,
here's v2 based on some IRC feedback (grammar- and punctuation-related)
I am planning to add for tomorrow.
---
Title: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments
Author: Thomas Deutschmann
Posted: 2020-08-05
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Due to genkernel-4.1 development whi
n pkg_postinst, see
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/tree/sys-apps/kexec-tools/kexec-tools-2.0.20-r3.ebuild?id=61c03ffab76740c0420e3c8a3185d047d461f7a7#n111
---
Title: Multiple root kernel command-line arguments
Author: Thomas Deutschmann
Posted: 2020-08-05
Revision: 1
News-Item-Format: 2.0
Due to
ot even what happened.
And yes, I probably wouldn't have notice this and wouldn't care if only
<3 were masked.
But again, that's not what has happened.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
my laptop. Thanks for
> nothing.
...and not just because of net-nntp/sabnzbd like this thread has shown.
I followed Gentoo policy when I reverted a broken commit.
If can only urge you to revise pkg list and pay more attention for your
next commit.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux
s supposed to work.
C'mon. You even added net-nntp/sabnzbd to that list again which created
a lot of drama beginning of this year. Please don't try to say you
reviewed anything...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 7
FYI:
I reverted the entire commit like this thread and bugs clearly show that
this list wasn't even reviewed/checked:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=b76ee2f3e20b55d268ec291a1a1328cc047f5a04
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24
n p-m should be treated like real devs. So
you can't just kill their packages because you want to.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
imap is just not user-friendly.
It doesn't even has deps on other Python packages blocking your cleanup
delusion.
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
ch is what basically
happened). It would be cool if our solution would be aware of this and
could handle this somehow. But I guess we would have to create our own
solution for this...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
fpr: C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74
gt; situation changing. -arch is so rare that I don't recall ever seeing
> it. In either case, restoring an arch should be an explicit action.
+1
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
On 2020-04-26 15:46, Kent Fredric wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Apr 2020 14:38:54 +0200
> Thomas Deutschmann wrote:
>
>> Let's assume we will get reports that app-misc/foo is only installed 20
>> times. If you are going to judge based on this data, "Obviously, nobody
>&
we would have data for distfiles.gentoo.org this won't help us.
See how Gentoo works: If you follow handbook you will pick a
local/regional mirror. Now all these users are suddenly 'disconnected'
from the download stats...
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
mation or share why you believe this has to be
removed. I assume you are talking about
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Handbook:AMD64/Installation/Disks and for
me it's not a *mess*.
Maybe move it to a 'legacy' sub page but it's too early for complete
removal from my P.O.V.
--
Reg
will
start to ignore that the data is useless just to underline *their* point
in their current situation. :/
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Hi,
merged, thanks:
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=606c745e611c216df15568bc8655e2781dc11095
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
packages until people learn that
stabilization is a lot of effort/work. Really, if you call for
stabilization and haven't tested your own package you are offloading
work to others which is not nice. I also dislike maintainers who simply
restrict tests on first failure. But in the end it's at leas
does it?
--
Regards,
Thomas Deutschmann / Gentoo Linux Developer
C4DD 695F A713 8F24 2AA1 5638 5849 7EE5 1D5D 74A5
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
vulnerability X in
Gentoo you heard about in the media, don't forget to check on your own
if this is also true for your architecture because in theory the
maintainer could have decided to make use of arch-depending eapply for
some reason..."
=> Keep it simple: Stable should mean th
1 - 100 of 243 matches
Mail list logo
