Jeffrey Gardner wrote:
> Big Thanks (TM) to wltjr, Christopher Satwell, and Roy Wright (right up
> the road in Chappell Hill - Love the smoked sausage!)!
> With those leads and some upstream love I hope to have jmol up and
> running soon!
>
>
Looks like you found me! Righ
Jeffrey Gardner wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
>
>> So, fellow devs, what's new with development?
>>
>
> As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies
> on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of:
>
> dev-java/ant-core
> dev-java/ant-contri
Boris Fersing wrote:
>
>
> AFAIK, the ruby related ebuilds use gem. For example rails has in his
> ebuild :
>
> "inherit ruby gems"
>
> and if you look in the gems eclass :
>
> [snip]
> And it's the same for rake !
>
> The problem might be (that's a supposition only) that gem installs the
> files i
Howdy,
Can someone point me to any documentation on why ebuilds are
being created for ruby gems?
Gem is the a nice, easy to use, standard package manager for ruby.
The problem that I see is if you install the same package via both
gem and portage all sorts of bad things happen. For the curious,
Anthony Gorecki wrote:
On Wednesday, April 05, 2006 16:08, m h wrote:
My question is how do other packages that build against a slotted
library know where to find the library?
Generally, there is no need to do that in an ebuild. The software package's
configure script will automatically
