Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: ion license

On 14/05/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Mike Frysinger wrote: >> Perhaps "atom," an uncharged single ion. =) > the words "uncharged ion" dont belong together as an ion by definition > carries a charge :p Heh how about "FreeRadical" then; don't they carry a charge? Other than tho, th

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: ion license

On 13/05/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ulrich Mueller napsal(a): > Maybe the following are also interesting in this context: > > Debian: > > > Archlinux: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Looking for help with 2.6 kernel maintenance

Count me in. Recently I've been having fun knocking up kernel modules at work so I understand the build system reasonably well. Happy to help wherever. Cheers Rob On 30/04/07, bret curtis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Daniel, I would love to be more involved in kernel details. I've been in

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions

On 20/04/07, Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Rob C wrote: > > > On 19/04/07, *Christian Faulhammer* <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>> wrote: > > Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>>: >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: File collisions

On 19/04/07, Christian Faulhammer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > On the issue of QA, I think enabling FEATURES="collision-detect" by > default would do a lot more good at this stage than "test". Arch teams normally have collision-protect enabled when doing keyword

Re: [gentoo-dev] Resignation

On 17/04/07, Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more. I'm therefore resigning from this project. I'm pretty sure it will be actually no loss for Gentoo, since

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-analyzer/traceroute merge strangeness

On 12/04/07, Jonathan Adamczewski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Jeff Walter wrote: > > I can understand traceroute being setuid, but why put it in /usr/sbin > so only root sees it? Huh? Just add /usr/sbin to your PATH. $ export PATH=$PATH:/usr/sbin $ traceroute Version 1.4a12 Usage: traceroute

Re: [gentoo-dev] New developer: Anant Narayanan (anant)

On 21/03/07, Ioannis Aslanidis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Welcome! I hope that you will have a good time! On 3/21/07, Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > It's my pleasure to introduce to you Anant Narayanan (also known as anant or > KillerX) our latest addition to the PHP herd. > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] About testing applications

On 19/03/07, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Monday 19 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote: > On Mon, 2007-03-19 at 03:38 -0400, Mike Frysinger wrote: > > what is the problem as you see it ? the nice thing about having a > > ~/.config/ is that it's a directory that can obviously be a

Re: [gentoo-dev] Gentoo's problems

On 14/03/07, M. Edward (Ed) Borasky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ciaran McCreesh wrote: > On Wed, 14 Mar 2007 19:30:37 +0100 Alexandre Buisse > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> I quite agree with the Patriot act comparison, and I would be >> interested to know what you think our real problems are.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

On 13/03/07, Christel Dahlskjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hiya all, As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this proposal can be found

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing the Proctors - Draft Code of Conduct for Gentoo

On 13/03/07, Christel Dahlskjaer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hiya all, As some of you are already aware, I was at the last Council meeting given a Task. This Task was to draft a proposed Code of Conduct for Gentoo, and a scheme for enforcing it. The current version of this proposal can be found

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Little respect towards Daniel please

On 06/03/07, Steve Long <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > Dear list, > > Why not simply naming the "formal logic rules" for the "official venue > where developers (and ex-developers and users) can talk out their > disagreements" to be: > 1. Anyone who is impolite get's kicke

Re: [gentoo-dev] Introducing Daniel Robbins (drobbins)

Welcome Back! I wasn't here before but welcome back anyway! On 28/02/07, Damian Florczyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Petteri Räty napisał(a): > It's my please to introduce to you Daniel "drobbins" Robbins. Daniel is > going to work with the amd64 arch team but will probably venture to > other ar

Re: [gentoo-dev] Dev Laptop Broken @ FOSDEM

So do I :-) Cheers -Rob On 26/02/07, Piotr Jaroszyński <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Some evil person broke my laptop screen at FOSDEM. What about the FOSDEM insurance? Hope you get needed cash and fix it fast. -- Best Regards, Piotr Jaroszyński -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list -- /

[gentoo-dev] Re: Dev Laptop Broken @ FOSDEM

Hey all, My blog entry is here : http://www.brokenpipe.co.uk/blog/?p=42 Thanks! -Rob On 26/02/07, Rob C <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hey all, Some evil person broke my laptop screen at FOSDEM. My laptop is really important to me, its where I do all of my dev work and its also my main

[gentoo-dev] Dev Laptop Broken @ FOSDEM

Hey all, Some evil person broke my laptop screen at FOSDEM. My laptop is really important to me, its where I do all of my dev work and its also my main way to communicate with my friends and family in the UK, I currently live in Switzerland. It would mean the world to me if you would take the t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Topic for Feb council meeting

For what its worth, I think option #2 is the best. I think option #1 is out of the question and I think that #3 is flawed because the 8th spot developer's situation or commitment to the project may have changed since the last vote and in any case that developer would be free to partake in the run

Re: [gentoo-dev] net-misc/e100 removal request

I'm sorry I dont have a test box for this but is it not needed for people maintaining 2.4 systems? On 24/01/07, Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: net-misc/e100 removal request Bug 159648 - hasn't been updated for ages, maintainer is completely MIA - uses check_KV instead of proper linux-