Hi all,
I just noticed that the use flag "gmp" is not set by default, even
though gmp is a mandatory dependency with gcc-4.x and should thus be
installed on nearly every system.
Are there reasons not to do so, or would it be more reasonable to
specificly ask the package mantainers of the affected
Am 27.03.2011 22:44, schrieb Rich Freeman:
> We shouldn't be punishing people for not becoming developers. I don't
> want to use a distro that throws up warning messages every few months
> because some package I've been using had its developer retire, and I'm
> a developer. If it breaks and I car
Am 27.03.2011 22:47, schrieb Nirbheek Chauhan:
> --- metadata.xml 22 Mar 2009 02:35:03 - 1.5
> +++ metadata.xml 27 Mar 2011 20:46:54 -
> @@ -3,7 +3,13 @@
>
>no-herd
>
> -maintainer-nee...@gentoo.org
> + Christopher Head
> + hea...@gentoo.org
That sho
Am 27.03.2011 15:30, schrieb Jeremy Olexa:
> The tree has 679 m-n packages.
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/qa/treecleaners/maintainer-needed.xml
If you cannot find someone else as a maintainer and someone is willing
to proxy me, I'd take dev-vcs/stgit: I use it on a daily basis (though
only to ma
Am 23.11.2010 09:52, schrieb Branko Badrljica:
>
> My question is, could existing Portage infrastructure be ported to such
> language with minimal effort and would it be worthwile to even try ?
>
> There are many operations that now take portage ages to complete, so it
> seems that this could be b
Am 21.06.2010 09:04, schrieb "Paweł Hajdan, Jr.":
> I think that "introspection" is similarly too general.
What about calling the useflag "GIR" (or "gir")? If the user does not
know what it stands for, he will hopefully look up the description to
see what it means. And in contrast to "introspectio
Am 03.04.2010 15:19, schrieb Ben de Groot:
> On 3 April 2010 11:46, Patrick Lauer wrote:
>> On 04/03/10 11:16, Tobias Scherbaum wrote:
>>> People are constantly asking for a documentation wiki, but ...
>> yeah, as long as no one just creates a wiki there won't be one. People
>> are waiting on othe
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 10.04.2010 20:11, schrieb Duncan:
> William Hubbs posted on Sat, 10 Apr 2010 12:18:41 -0500 as excerpted:
>
>> - a phrase captcha (complete the phrase)
>
> The thing I've always read about these is that they tend to discriminate
> against those f
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 29.03.2010 01:47, schrieb Joshua Saddler:
> 'Specially since they so often go defunct after a very short time -- I'm
> thinking of all the Portage frontends in particular.
Don't know what you are talking about :) ... Portato is now in its
fourth y
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
currently I am a maintainer for two packages -- and as a non-gentoo-dev
being proxied by guys who are.
Now a disadvantage of this position are the restricted rights in
bugzilla. In case a bug is filed for one of my maintained packages I
have
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 28.03.2010 21:04, schrieb Brian Harring:
> Instead, if the purpose is a "thanks", why not every once in a while
> put up a news item discussing the tools in question? Such an
> approach allows folk to focus in on whatever is useful/interesting
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 28.03.2010 10:30, schrieb Luis Francisco Araujo:
> himerge
Hey :P - you are a gentoo dev :P
I think probably most of the app-portage category falls in here (as
portage is the only "gentoo-specific" thing one can develop stuff for):
eix, etc-propo
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Harley Peters schrieb:
> I'm getting good numbers from the command line but in the ebuild it's
> much different.
> I haven't timed it but it takes about 25 minutes to do a full
> checkout and about a third that to do the light weight checkout.
> The up
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dale schrieb:
> As for people knowing about Gentoo and the forums, go to google and type
> in Gentoo. First hit, Gentoo home page. Even includes links to the
> docs and other pages that are handy.
Allow me a short remark: Enter "gentoo forum" - and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Christian Faulhammer schrieb:
> Hi,
>
> René 'Necoro' Neumann :
>> So I'd vote for switching back to using normal checkouts (or branches
>> - they don't really differ in bzr for that matter).
>
> My
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René 'Necoro' Neumann schrieb:
> As one can easily see: While the fetch time for co and lw-co are more or
> less equal, the export time is not. As one can say, that each package is
> at least exported as often as updated (if no
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have some doubts about the usage of "co --lightweight" instead of the
plain "co". The only reason I can see is the reduced disk-space needed.
Because concerning time, the lightweight checkouts take (way) longer...
Just some bash-time tests done with
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Perhaps add "> /dev/null" to the pushd/popd calls? To get rid of
unnecessary output.
- - Necoro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkmxTBcACgkQ4UO
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto schrieb:
> Hi.
>
> Christian Faulhammer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> a user maintained a Bazaar overlay for some time now and introduced
>> some changes to bzr eclass, I would like to introduce into the tree.
>> Please review the att
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Duncan schrieb:
> Tiziano Müller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> posted [EMAIL PROTECTED],
> excerpted below, on Mon, 24 Nov 2008 07:56:20 +:
>
>> Now, since the sunrise project gets bigger, we might also create a
>> mailinglist to discuss ebuilds for people
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René 'Necoro' Neumann schrieb:
> Only oddity are
> revnos of merged branches (e.g. "193.1.10")
Gnah - forget this issue.. from the main branch' viewpoint, the last
change is always in the merge revision, and not in a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson schrieb:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2008 at 12:37:09AM +0200, Ren?? 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
>> - --or: to have the unique rev-id instead of the branch-local rev-number--
>> bzr log -l1 --show-ids $FILE | grep "revision-id" | cut -f2 -d' '
> IIR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Robin H. Johnson schrieb:
> On Tue, Aug 26, 2008 at 04:57:50PM -0500, Yuri Vasilevski wrote:
>> I am writing a tool that creates deb (as in Debian package format) based
>> distributions from gentoo packages and that tool encodes the CVS
>> revision as
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico schrieb:
> Well, RESTRICT has long since evolved into a rather generic set of
> boolean flags and it's quite useful as such. I don't see any need
> for artificial limitations on what types of flags go there.
For you it is just "one variable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Zac Medico schrieb:
> I chose "live" because I think it's easy for people to associate it
> with "live ebuilds", which I believe is a common term used to refer
> to ebuild that download live sources in src_unpack. What's in a name
> though? I'll gladly
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
>>> - xdg-icon-resource install --> let it run? - or disable it (and
>>> replace it by what)?
>
> unsure (as i've neved touched it) but i'd say if it respects DESTDIR and
> doesn't have any file-collisions when installing, let
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René 'Necoro' Neumann schrieb:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm currently trying to update an ebuild (x11-misc/zim) to a new version.
> The old one uses a patch to disable running "update-desktop-database" and
> instead us
Hi list,
I'm currently trying to update an ebuild (x11-misc/zim) to a new version.
The old one uses a patch to disable running "update-desktop-database" and
instead using the fdo-mime_desktop_database_update function.
Now - the new ebuild also wants to call:
- update-mime-database --> disable an
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
René 'Necoro' Neumann schrieb:
| Hi,
|
| Christian Faulhammer schrieb:
| | We have a prior version for some time now in the Emacs overlay for two
| | live ebuilds...so we go and merge your changed (ulm already did), test
| | it and
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
Christian Faulhammer schrieb:
| We have a prior version for some time now in the Emacs overlay for two
| live ebuilds...so we go and merge your changed (ulm already did), test
| it and report any problems.
I just copied the bzr.eclass from the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I'm not a gentoo-dev - and I did not read the whole thread, because it
was too political for me (do I really have to read all these IRC quotes?).
But I just had an idea for this topic (don't know if anyone had this
already - or if it is not applicabl
Wolfram Schlich schrieb:
> * Hanno Böck <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-11-26 15:39]:
>> [...]
>> So I'd like to unmask it soon. Please, if you're using mailman test it, tell
>> me if it suits your needs or just give me feedback like "worksforme", I
>> actually don't have a clue how many people really
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Wulf C. Krueger schrieb:
> On Friday, 09. November 2007 10:10:42 René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
>> But as I think, that the uppercase version is the common behavior here,
>> it should not need this extra "PY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ingmar Vanhassel schrieb:
> 2007/11/9, René 'Necoro' Neumann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Steve Long schrieb:
>>> René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
>>>> cmake-utils_src_enable python => -DE
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Long schrieb:
> René 'Necoro' Neumann wrote:
>> cmake-utils_src_enable python => -DENABLE_python=...
>>
>> Wanted would be that it returned -DENABLE_PYTHON=...
>>
>> I'm not into bash scripting
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi all,
I just worked on a project using cmake. And I needed the
cmake-utils_src_enable function...
But it did not work as expected. This is because cmake arguments are in
uppercase most of the time, and cmake is case sensitive.
And unfortunately the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Donnie Berkholz schrieb:
> On 17:03 Sat 20 Oct , Markus Ullmann (jokey) wrote:
>> 1.1 app-portage/portato/portato-0.8.6.ebuild
>>
>> file :
>> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/app-portage/portato/portato-0.8.6.ebuil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mike Frysinger schrieb:
> On Monday 24 September 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
>> On 09:38 Mon 24 Sep , Richard Brown (rbrown) wrote:
>>> if [ ! -n "$(readlink ${ROOT}usr/bin/ruby)" ] ; then
>>> ${ROOT}usr/sbin/ruby-config ruby${SLOT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Samuli Suominen schrieb:
> User posted me today these:
>
> http://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?article_id=2219416&view_id=235
> http://www.spreadshirt.net/shop.php?op=article&article_id=311913&p=1
>
> Seems they are making money with products that ha
39 matches
Mail list logo
