On 2014-10-19, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> On 2014-10-12, Nuno Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
>> On 2014-09-02, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> They were already masked, but because of
>>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/amitchowdhry/2
On 2014-10-12, Nuno Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
> On 2014-09-02, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> They were already masked, but because of
>> http://www.forbes.com/sites/amitchowdhry/2014/08/31/msn-messenger-is-completely-shutting-down-on-october-31st/
>> , I see no point having these packages
On 2013-03-31, Walter Dnes wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 04:45:50PM +0200, Samuli Suominen wrote
>
>> Those 70-* and 80-* are in udev pkg_postinst, this news item,
>> everywhere... can all 3 be deleted if you haven't modified them yourself.
>>
>> So that leaves one... local.rules... dunno ab
On 2013-03-31, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 31/03/13 04:06, Philip Webb wrote:
>> 130329 Samuli Suominen wrote:
>>> Attached new version again, more generic than before.
>>
>> I find this difficult to decipher. Who is it aimed at ?
>>
>> I've just updated to Udev 200 . Following the news item,
>>
On 2013-03-29, Samuli Suominen wrote:
> On 29/03/13 18:21, Nuno J. Silva (aka njsg) wrote:
>> On 2013-03-29, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
>>> On 29/03/2013 12:34, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>>>> Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb:
>>>>>> If my deskto
On 2013-03-29, Diego Elio Pettenò wrote:
> On 29/03/2013 12:34, Chí-Thanh Christopher Nguyễn wrote:
>> Diego Elio Pettenò schrieb:
>>> > If my desktop only has one Ethernet interface, no matter how many kernel
>>> > changes happen, it'll always be eth0.
>> That was not true with the old persistent
On 2013-03-25, Rafael Goncalves Martins wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 22, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Markos Chandras wrote:
>>
>> # Markos Chandras (22 Mar 2013)
>> # Fails with automake-1.12 (#424289)
>> # Problems with the alsa patches (#403389)
>> # Herd has not interest in it and needs a maintainer
>> # Remova
On 2013-01-25, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 2:47 PM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
>>
>> Sorry, what's the difference between cheching =y and =m? I thought those
>> were both part of the kernel config...
>
> I'm talking about /proc/config.gz, whic
On 2013-01-25, Rich Freeman wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 25, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Nuno J. Silva wrote:
>> Is there any syntax to check if something is either disabled or built as
>> a module?
>
> Very problematic. What is built in for the currently running kernel
> can be fairl
On 2013-01-22, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> I'm raising this patch because of the recent spate of bugs with the
> latest udev that now fails to boot your system if CONFIG_DEVTMPFS is
> not available in your kernel.
>
> Bugs: 408947, 409393, 437320, 453074
>
> CONFIG_CHECK has not been fatal for so
On 2013-01-10, Daniel Campbell wrote:
> On 01/09/2013 04:13 PM, William Hubbs wrote:
>> All,
>>
>> as you probably know by now, udev-197 has hit the tree.
>>
>> This new version implements a new feature called predictable
>> network interface names [1], which I have currently turned off for
>> l
On 2012-12-31, Alexis Ballier wrote:
> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 15:15:25 +0100
> Michał Górny wrote:
>
>> On Sun, 30 Dec 2012 11:01:52 -0300
>> Alexis Ballier wrote:
>>
>> > > Etc. ffmpeg is like the holy grail of local bindist descriptions.
>> >
>> > bindist does absolutely nothing by itself there
On 2012-12-30, Alexander Berntsen wrote:
> All packages should have local descriptions of what the bindist
> USE-flag specifically does. This should be a policy when writing
> ebuilds that include it.
Agreed, as a gentoo user, I like to know why is the flag there.
> The bindist USE-flag is for a
13 matches
Mail list logo
