Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: Support for sys-kernel/dkms via a dkms.eclass in Gentoo

2025-03-31 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
ory enable natinst" and enable the "dkms" USE flag. Please report any issues you find to me at github.com/Nowa-Ammerlaan/natinst/issues Some documentation is on the wiki: wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/DKMS Best regards, Nowa On 04/03/2025 15:50, Nowa Ammerlaan wrote: Dear all, This con

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-build.eclass: do not override MODULES_SIGN_KEY with temp key

2025-03-27 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
we are merging a binpkg of the kernel. Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- eclass/kernel-build.eclass | 15 --- 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-build.eclass b/eclass/kernel-build.eclass index 65433d9fc9c0..1d8c396b9590 100644 --- a/eclass

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 4/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: make modules_process_dracut.conf.d public

2025-03-20 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 19/03/2025 23:37, Eli Schwartz wrote: On 3/19/25 6:10 PM, Sam James wrote: If we're doing it orphaned, it should be done as hooks instead rather than with any integration in the ebuild, though. postinst / orphaned files are broadly a hack. Orphaned files break a bunch of invariants including

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 4/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: make modules_process_dracut.conf.d public

2025-03-20 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 19/03/2025 23:10, Sam James wrote: Nowa Ammerlaan writes: On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote: Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100 as

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 4/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: make modules_process_dracut.conf.d public

2025-03-19 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 19/03/2025 09:48, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:57:38AM +0100, Nowa Ammerlaan wrote: On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote: Nowa Ammerlaan posted on

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: [PATCH 4/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: make modules_process_dracut.conf.d public

2025-03-19 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote: Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100 as excerpted: I had really hoped to receive more comments on my earlier

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: make modules_process_dracut.conf.d public

2025-03-17 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 15/03/2025 04:56, Ionen Wolkens wrote: This just feels like a messy half-solution that we're better off without. So NACK from me, both for linux-mod-r1 and adding support to my packages like nvidia-drivers. Not that I'll revert if it gets merged anyway. Is there anything I can say or do to

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] use.desc: document new dkms flag

2025-03-15 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- profiles/use.desc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/profiles/use.desc b/profiles/use.desc index 36468b321ddb..6e8329009947 100644 --- a/profiles/use.desc +++ b/profiles/use.desc @@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ dedicated - Add support for dedicated game

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: make modules_process_dracut.conf.d public

2025-03-15 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 14/03/2025 17:23, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Fri, Mar 14, 2025 at 01:48:50PM +0100, Nowa Ammerlaan wrote: eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass | 7 +++ ftr my opinion on this hasn't changed since the beginning, I was hoping that the idea would be scrapped early rather than more work being put

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/5] dkms.eclass: introduce new eclass

2025-03-14 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 14/03/2025 16:34, Alexey Sokolov wrote: 14.03.2025 12:48, Nowa Ammerlaan пишет: Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- eclass/dkms.eclass | 545 + 1 file changed, 545 insertions(+) create mode 100644 eclass/dkms.eclass diff --git a/eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/5] dkms.eclass: introduce new eclass

2025-03-14 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- eclass/dkms.eclass | 545 + 1 file changed, 545 insertions(+) create mode 100644 eclass/dkms.eclass diff --git a/eclass/dkms.eclass b/eclass/dkms.eclass new file mode 100644 index ..c445b95721c3 --- /dev

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/5] profiles: mask dkms flag where not available

2025-03-14 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
and stable mask for now Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- profiles/arch/amd64/use.mask| 4 profiles/arch/amd64/use.stable.mask | 4 profiles/arch/arm64/use.mask| 4 profiles/arch/arm64/use.stable.mask | 4 profiles/arch/base/use.mask | 4

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: make modules_process_dracut.conf.d public

2025-03-14 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
so we can re-use this function in dkms.eclass. Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass | 7 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass b/eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass index fd83324fa35d..d736f48d679e 100644 --- a/eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: move modlist processing into separate func

2025-03-14 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
Does not really change anything but avoids duplication in dkms.eclass Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass | 78 +- 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass b/eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass

[gentoo-dev] RFC: Support for sys-kernel/dkms via a dkms.eclass in Gentoo

2025-03-04 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
Dear all, This concept has turned out to be more controversial then I anticipated, so I think it warrants broader discussion here on the mailing list. Let me first explain some background information so everyone knows what we are talking about, and then afterwards concretely discuss my idea fo

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] sys-firmware/intel-microcode: use --all to reinstall dist-kernel initrd

2025-03-03 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- .../intel-microcode/intel-microcode-20240910_p20240915.ebuild | 2 +- .../intel-microcode/intel-microcode-20241112_p20241103.ebuild | 2 +- .../intel-microcode/intel-microcode-20250211_p20250211.ebuild | 2 +- 3 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] sys-kernel/linux-firmware: use --all to reinstall dist-kernel initrd

2025-03-03 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- sys-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware-20241210-r1.ebuild | 2 +- sys-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware-20250109-r1.ebuild | 2 +- sys-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware-20250211.ebuild| 2 +- sys-kernel/linux-firmware/linux-firmware-.ebuild

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] kernel-install.eclass: cleanup dead symlinks after removal

2025-03-03 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
Which leads to some ugliness further down the line. We can easily resolve the problem by cleaning up these dead symlinks. Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- eclass/kernel-install.eclass | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-install.eclass b/eclass/kernel-install.eclass

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] dist-kernel-utils.eclass: pass on extra args to installkernel v56

2025-03-03 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
Installkernel v56 has gained the capability of parsing optional arguments. Adjust the helper functions here so ebuilds can pass on these extra arguments directly to installkernel. Signed-off-by: Nowa Ammerlaan --- eclass/dist-kernel-utils.eclass | 72 +++-- 1 file

[gentoo-dev] Removal dev-python/{shiboken6,pyside6-tools}: merged into dev-python/pyside

2025-02-21 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
# Nowa Ammerlaan (2025-02-21) # Shiboken and Pyside-tools have been merged into dev-python/pyside # as of version 6.8.2. Pyside-tools are useable when the "tools" USE # flag is enabled. dev-python/shiboken6 dev-python/pyside6-tools

[gentoo-dev] 2025-xx-yy-dracut-hostonly: new news item

2025-01-24 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
) recommendation on the wiki. Please let me know if the below is clear. See-also: https://github.com/dracut-ng/dracut-ng/pull/1158 Best regards, Nowa Title: Dracut changed default for hostonly setting Author: Nowa Ammerlaan Posted: 2025-xx-yy Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-build.eclass: install x509.genkey and everything else in certs/

2024-11-08 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
: Nowa Ammerlaan --- eclass/kernel-build.eclass | 11 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/kernel-build.eclass b/eclass/kernel-build.eclass index 4a2af9845ad4..9d33aef92691 100644 --- a/eclass/kernel-build.eclass +++ b/eclass/kernel-build.eclass @@ -397,7

Re: [gentoo-dev] Serious problem with inheritance of RDEPEND, BDEPEND, DEPEND,

2024-11-01 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 01/11/2024 19:28, Desarrollos WEB wrote: Seeing this problem, you should always use the variables RDEPEND, BDEPEND, DEPEND, adding content, not replacing it (of course, there may be a special case), but as a general rule you should add, not replace, these variables, both in eclass and ebui

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Splitting dev-lang/python into per-slot packages, starting with 3.14

2024-10-12 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
On 12/10/2024 10:12, Michał Górny wrote: This approach has been causing a major annoyance for users -- due to Portage "greedy" upgrade behavior, any time a new Python version was keyworded, Portage insisted on installing it, even though user's selected targets did not request the specific version

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-install.eclass: fix objcopy overwriting uki

2024-10-09 Thread Nowa Ammerlaan
From 2a98da86d978d4a4ffaa61390cc2253026e1e3de Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Tue, 1 Oct 2024 20:34:43 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] kernel-install.eclass: fix objcopy overwriting uki From the manual: If you do not specify outfile, objcopy creates a temporary file and destructivel

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-install.eclass: run depmod after compressing modules

2024-08-09 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 09/08/2024 18:11, Michał Górny wrote: On Fri, 2024-08-09 at 17:49 +0200, Andrew Ammerlaan wrote: (de)compressing modules changes the path of the module files so we need to run depmod to ensure that tools such as modprobe/modinfo work. Note that depmod is often, but *not* always, run by sys-k

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] kernel-install.eclass: improve kernel version check

2024-07-15 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
Part of https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/37327 From bcbc9191becab3cda6af8f9f2c0e1da6ebe395e1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Calligeros Date: Sat, 13 Jul 2024 22:47:33 +1000 Subject: [PATCH] kernel-install.eclass: improve kernel version check Now that we have an improved version check

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] kernel-build.eclass: sanity check the prepared kernel's release string

2024-07-15 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
Part of https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/37327 From ec4e55ae9fd7cc6a4833981040f051ad2a3df15b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Calligeros Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 03:44:38 + Subject: [PATCH] kernel-build.eclass: check that KV_FULL matches the kernel release We want to ensure all our

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] kernel-build.eclass: sanity check the prepared kernel's release string

2024-07-15 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
Part of https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/37327 From 021915604b90ee45332dc373f401e52afa832370 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Calligeros Date: Sat, 29 Jun 2024 01:55:12 + Subject: [PATCH] kernel-build.eclass: sanity check the prepared kernel's release string Previously, this was o

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] kernel-{build,install}.eclass: make kernel install paths match release

2024-07-15 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
Part of https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/37327 From d57b75ed204432c11ae643ea3526b46dab40c746 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: James Calligeros Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2024 05:56:44 + Subject: [PATCH] kernel-{build,install}.eclass: make kernel install paths match release dist-kernel releases a

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-install: Improve warning, consider alternate initrd generators

2024-07-15 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
Part of https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/33634 From f442d70bdbd0d410809ede4c23fe476177eee55d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Zen Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2024 13:04:35 -0500 Subject: [PATCH] kernel-install: Improve warning, consider alternate initrd generators Signed-off-by: Zen --- eclass/kern

Re: [gentoo-dev] Pakackages up for grabs

2024-07-05 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 04/07/2024 00:01, Matthias Maier wrote: Dear all, I have had little time to contribute to Gentoo over the last 24 months. Therefore, I need to downsize in actively maintained packages. I will drop myself as maintainer from the following packages in the next couple days. Please adopt them if

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5 v3] mount-boot.eclass: check for ESP as well as /boot, split, eclass

2024-06-28 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 28/06/2024 08:33, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan wrote: On 27/06/2024 06:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote: AFAICS, no EAPI 6 ebuild inherits mount-boot, so EAPI 6 could be dropped? Yes, might as well drop that now. Here's v2: This could be simplifi

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/5 v2] kernel-install.eclass: move mount-boot check to, dist-kernel-utils.eclass

2024-06-27 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 27/06/2024 06:07, Ulrich Mueller wrote: IMHO "while true" would be better readable. Adjusted, here's v2: From 422fcc5fb53c3f2adf25256fb7d18a65e4036496 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:12:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] kernel-install.eclass: move mount-bo

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5 v2] mount-boot.eclass: check for ESP as well as /boot, split, eclass

2024-06-27 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 27/06/2024 06:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote: AFAICS, no EAPI 6 ebuild inherits mount-boot, so EAPI 6 could be dropped? Yes, might as well drop that now. Here's v2: From 9f6e912237bf1f67b3bb5341e64449a6b02703bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:08:49 +0200

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 5/5] sys-firmware/intel-microcode: complain less when /boot is not, mounted

2024-06-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
From c5cf62a41038e344312d8758a4ba232fcd726053 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:36:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sys-firmware/intel-microcode: complain less when /boot is not mounted When using dist-kernel users can correct the problem and then emerge --con

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/5] sys-kernel/linux-firmware: complain less when /boot is not, mounted

2024-06-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
From 45a34aecafa64a666976e3d3d7944f8c8ff1e058 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:32:42 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] sys-kernel/linux-firmware: complain less when /boot is not mounted when using dist-kernel we can correct the problem and then emerge --config ...

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/5] linux-mod-r1.eclass: check /boot if we are re-installing, dist-kernel

2024-06-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
From 3c5267472fb72223336063007173157a5de3f0cc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:15:05 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] linux-mod-r1.eclass: check /boot if we are re-installing dist-kernel Previous commit already adds the check when we call dist-kernel_reinstall_ini

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/5] kernel-install.eclass: move mount-boot check to, dist-kernel-utils.eclass

2024-06-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
From c4c5ef732670f8b23f20b1215af49cdceacd28a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:12:39 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] kernel-install.eclass: move mount-boot check to dist-kernel-utils.eclass ebuilds and eclasses using dist-kernel_reinstall_initramfs should also ha

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/5] mount-boot.eclass: check for ESP as well as /boot, split, eclass

2024-06-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
From 53f844361df57d480480b5e0ab0f35d2788ebf6a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:08:49 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] mount-boot.eclass: check for ESP as well as /boot, split eclass This eclass is used by when the dist-kernel has to re-installed. Depending on the

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/5] mount-boot.eclass: revises /boot checking for dist-kernels, add checks for ESP

2024-06-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
Part of: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/37292 This series builds on the previous patch: "kernel-build.eclass: identify dist-kernels, and warn users" Effectively, the change amounts to harmonizing the way ebuilds/eclasses using "dist-kernel_reinstall_initramfs" re-install the dist-kerne

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] kernel-build.eclass: identify dist-kernels, and warn users

2024-06-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
Part of https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/37281 From c88eee66089333fbcee6377b5f580e70a4ec2a8c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Ammerlaan Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 22:18:46 +0200 Subject: [PATCH] kernel-build.eclass: identify dist-kernels, and warn users Many, many, new users at some point

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 0/7] Changes to dracut kernel module/microcode handling

2024-05-14 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
Hi all, This patch series essential moves the dist-kernel initramfs/UKI rebuilding out off zfs-kmod.ebuild and into linux-mod-r1.eclass. In the process we fix several issues: - zfs-kmod.ebuild binpkgs no longer rebuild currently running kernel, but uses instead the kernel version that matches

[gentoo-dev] Last-rites: sci-visualization/spectromatic

2024-04-18 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
# Andrew Ammerlaan (2024-04-18) # Upstream gone, unfetchable, stuck on EAPI 6. Bug 605796 # Removal on 2024-05-18 sci-visualization/spectromatic

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: sci-libs/scikit-optimize

2024-03-10 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
# Andrew Ammerlaan (2024-03-10) # Archived upstream, latest release is 3 years old. One test # failure with python 3.11, more with python 3.12. # Removal on: 2024-04-10. Bug #920439 sci-libs/scikit-optimize

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-python/anyqt

2024-03-09 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
# Andrew Ammerlaan (2024-03-09) # Requires pyside2/shiboken2, which is unmaintained upstream and # not compatible with llvm-16 and up or python-3.12 and up. # No upstream activity for 2 years. # dev-python/QtPy is an alternative that does support Qt6. # Removal on: 2024-04-09. Bug #926548 dev-py

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2024-02-26-debianutils-drops-installkernel-dep: add news item v2

2024-02-28 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 27/02/2024 18:24, Hank Leininger wrote: On 2024-02-27, andrewammerlaan wrote: Until recently, sys-apps/debianutils was in turn pulled in by app-misc/ca-certificates, an essential package installed on many systems. This is no longer the case.[2]. As a result many users may find that sys-apps/

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2024-02-26-debianutils-drops-installkernel-dep: add news item v2

2024-02-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 27/02/2024 07:26, Ulrich Mueller wrote: On Mon, 26 Feb 2024, Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan wrote: Title: installkernel is no longer implicitly installed Author: Andrew Ammerlaan Posted: 2024-02-26 Revision: 1 News-Item-Format: 2.0 Display-If-Installed: sys-kernel/installkernel Display-If

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: 2024-02-26-debianutils-drops-installkernel-dep: add news item

2024-02-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 27/02/2024 04:55, Duncan wrote: Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 26 Feb 2024 18:13:32 +0100 as excerpted: Removing sys-kernel/installkernel from your system WILL change the way kernels are installed by 'make install'! Instead of the versioned /boot/vmlinuz-x.y.z that you a

Re: [gentoo-dev] 2024-02-26-debianutils-drops-installkernel-dep: add news item

2024-02-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
On 27/02/2024 03:28, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 22:39:13 +, Lucio Sauer wrote: On Mon, Feb 26, 2024 at 06:13:32PM +0100, Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan wrote: Previously sys-kernel/installkernel was implicitly installed on many systems via a dependency in sys-apps/debianutils

[gentoo-dev] 2024-02-26-debianutils-drops-installkernel-dep: add news item

2024-02-26 Thread Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan
This draft news item accompanies: https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/35533 Random packages requiring some tool from Debian should not cause the kernel installation process to change. The dropping of the debianutils dependency in ca-certificates has already caused some surprises due to ins