Re: [gentoo-dev] Removal Request for Gnome 1.4

2006-11-04 Thread Nick Devito
I *think* I suggested this a while back to a few developers, but, that didn't get anywhere. I don't see any issues with removing it. ~ nick On Sun, 2006-11-05 at 02:22 -0500, Doug Goldstein wrote: > Howdy everyone, > > On the heels of VWA getting the pounding they've needed all season comes > thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] SCHEDULED DOWNTIME: {cvs,svn}.gentoo.org - 2006-10-05 - 1900UTC - 2300UTC

2006-10-02 Thread Nick Devito
> > -o()o-- > Michael Cummings |#gentoo-dev, #gentoo-perl > Gentoo Perl Dev|on irc.freenode.net > Gentoo/SPARC > Gentoo/AMD64 > GPG: 0543 6FA3 5F82 3A76 3BF7 8323 AB5C ED4E 9E7F 4E2E > -o()o--

Re: [gentoo-dev] LAMP Server beauty contest: server monitoring

2006-10-01 Thread Nick Devito
On Sun, 2006-10-01 at 21:41 +0100, Stuart Herbert wrote: > Hi, > > One of the things that the LAMP Server seed will install will be > something to do automatic server monitoring - CPU, RAM, swap, disk > space, bandwidth, and so on. > > I'm a cacti user myself on my own boxes, but I'm interested t

Re: [gentoo-dev] Last rites: tuxracer/tuxracer-demo

2006-09-29 Thread Nick Devito
sonally, I don't see a problem with these being removed. It looks like its been dead for quite a while now, and, the community shouldn't really mind its removal. -- Nick Devito <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

Re: [gentoo-dev] KDE and Ruby herd call for help

2006-09-14 Thread Nick Devito
On Tue, 2006-08-22 at 13:39 -0700, Aaron Kulbe wrote: > On 8/22/06, Caleb Tennis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi all, > > Right now both the KDE and Ruby herds (which, informally, I am > the *lead* > on both) are hurting for people. I don't have the time to

Re: [gentoo-dev] GIMP 1.2 has gotta die

2006-09-12 Thread Nick Devito
On Tue, 2006-09-12 at 11:56 +0200, Luca Barbato wrote: > Hanno Böck wrote: > > Am Dienstag, 12. September 2006 02:46 schrieb Michael Cummings: > >> Looks like that will break media-gfx/frontline (=media-gfx/gimp-1.2*) > >> and gimp-freetype-0.2-r3 (also =media-gfx/gimp-1.2*). > > > > frontline is

Re: [gentoo-dev] Yet Another Victim

2006-07-19 Thread Nick Devito
Haha, *prints that out and puts it on his monitor* :D On Sun, 2006-07-16 at 22:05 +0200, Jakub Moc wrote: > Michael Cummings wrote: > > I'm happy to announce a new addition to the perl team > > Welcome! Perl, huh? :P > > http://fastar.detonate.net/ftp/images/matrixse/18/6.jpg > -- gentoo-dev@g

Re: [gentoo-dev] IMPORTANT: bugs performance issues

2006-07-05 Thread Nick Devito
Yay for new servers! :) Hopefully, this should fix the performance issues thats been occuring for the last 5 months or so. ~ Nick On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 19:45 -0500, Lance Albertson wrote: > All- > > Just thought I'd update you on some of issue's we've been having with > bugzilla.g.o lately. Yes

Re: [gentoo-dev] init.d problem

2006-07-04 Thread Nick Devito
One slightly hackish way would be the grab the PID, and check in ps aux as to if it was running. That's one way to do what you are talking about. ~ nick On Wed, 2006-07-05 at 00:43 +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote: > * Pablo Yanez Trujillo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > what about "/etc/init.d/ntpd

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: GPL and Source code providing

2006-07-04 Thread Nick Devito
It wouldn't be a hard task to accomplish (to put the sources on the mirrors), since *most* of the source is already on the mirrors in some form or another. We could make an option when downloading the livecd to either download ones with the sources included, or without, and, include links to downlo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Mobile Computing herd severely understaffed

2006-07-04 Thread Nick Devito
Since I'm not a developer, I can't exactly help with maintaining, but, I got two laptops so, I bet I could test anything out which you might need tested. Just let me know if that would help in any way (I got a ton of free time and nothing to do, so, might as well :) ~ Nick On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 1

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Re: Re: GPL and Source code providing

2006-07-04 Thread Nick Devito
It would *probably* be easier to take the /usr/portage/distfiles directory and pop that on a CD, or, have the option of putting those files in a directory on the livecd. It shouldn't be too hard to do, however, it would take up more space on the CD. On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 11:59 -0400, Patrick McLea

Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtualization Herd

2006-07-04 Thread Nick Devito
n. On Tue, 2006-07-04 at 12:11 +0100, Chris Bainbridge wrote: > On 03/07/06, Benedikt Böhm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Monday 03 July 2006 21:56, Nick Devito wrote: > > > Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of > > > virtualiz

Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtualization Herd

2006-07-03 Thread Nick Devito
Mon, 2006-07-03 at 22:28 +0200, Benedikt Böhm wrote: > > On Monday 03 July 2006 21:56, Nick Devito wrote: > > > Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of > > > virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems > > >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtualization Herd

2006-07-03 Thread Nick Devito
integrated into the VPS project (with a different > > herd) but i don't know what their maintainers are thinking about this > > > > > On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:48 +0200, Benedikt Böhm wrote: > > > > On Monday 03 July 2006 19:49, Nick Devito wrote: > > > > &

Re: [gentoo-dev] Virtualization Herd

2006-07-03 Thread Nick Devito
Okay, in that case, extend the vserver herd to include a larger range of virtualization stuff, including Xen, Bochs, and so on. It just seems more fitting to group those packages together. On Mon, 2006-07-03 at 21:48 +0200, Benedikt Böhm wrote: > On Monday 03 July 2006 19:49, Nick Devito wr

[gentoo-dev] Virtualization Herd

2006-07-03 Thread Nick Devito
Looking at the number of virtualization-related packages (xen, openvz, and related packages) that are in portage, and the increasing complexity of these packages (which means more problems, as usual), I'm suggesting that a Virtualization herd be formed to handle these packages. I was also going to