[gentoo-dev] Re: Is it possible to ignore / override parts of binpkg environment locally?

2014-05-18 Thread Leho Kraav
On 19.05.2014 03:11, Leho Kraav wrote: Do I now always have to rebuild all the packages to get the new changes to user.eclass included? I'd really like to just ignore the environment file coming with the binpkg and the let the local system determine pretty much everything. Then I could

[gentoo-dev] Is it possible to ignore / override parts of binpkg environment locally?

2014-05-18 Thread Leho Kraav
Hi all Scenario: I'm developing yet another bootstrapping process for whatever reason. Let's say the project needs some changes made to user.eclass. I make the changes, set eclass-overrides, do my test bootstrapping run, build all the packages. Then on the binclient, it turns out something

Re: [gentoo-dev] PHP_TARGETS vs PYTHON_TARGETS different grammar, why?

2013-07-28 Thread Leho Kraav
On 27.07.2013 11:08, Michał Górny wrote: Dnia 2013-07-27, o godz. 10:37:04 Leho Kraav napisał(a): php5-5 vs python2_7 Why, how did that happen? Because some people like to type 'php_targets_php5-5'. Thanks everyone for replying. Wondering if there's any plan for proper

[gentoo-dev] PHP_TARGETS vs PYTHON_TARGETS different grammar, why?

2013-07-27 Thread Leho Kraav
php5-5 vs python2_7 Why, how did that happen?

[gentoo-dev] Ebuilds for nodejs apps - HOWTO?

2013-02-17 Thread Leho Kraav
Hi all I'm taking a look at etherpad-lite ebuild at https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=328897 It's a pretty big of a mess, but as I'm searching around, I can't really find any guidelines on how nodejs / npm stuff is supposed fit in with Portage. dev-nodejs/ doesn't even exist. Is thi

Re: [gentoo-dev] emerge --depclean vs missing IUSE in older ebuild.. what exactly is right?

2013-01-02 Thread Leho Kraav
Ok my conclusion is then that gdm-3.4.1.ebuild should be patched for [systemd?-], considering it seems otherwise fully compatible with current stable pambase. Opinions? -- Sent from my Nokia N9On 31.12.12 17:34 Michał Górny wrote: On Mon, 31 Dec 2012 17:22:16 +0200 Leho Kraav wrote: > J

[gentoo-dev] emerge --depclean vs missing IUSE in older ebuild.. what exactly is right?

2012-12-31 Thread Leho Kraav
Hi all Just bumped into something I haven't encountered before. Running amd64. Already had sys-auth/pambase-20101024-r2 (stable) installed. Then installed gnome-base/gdm-3.4.1-r3 binpkg, binhost had newer pambase, which is why this didn't surface before. Everything is fine for runtime, but

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones

2012-04-20 Thread Leho Kraav
On 20.04.2012 22:59, Mike Frysinger wrote: i just committed it since no one responded. so sync up. $ EPATCH_OPTS="--ignore-whitespace" emerge -va pf-sources that's not the intention. EPATCH_OPTS modification should be inside the ebuild. I can't see how having this available could hurt any

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones

2012-04-20 Thread Leho Kraav
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote: it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz (-f#) level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they want to kill off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so i'd like to s

Re: [gentoo-dev] epatch: splitting out common options from user-specific ones

2012-04-20 Thread Leho Kraav
On Wednesday, April 18, 2012 9:10:02 PM UTC+3, Mike Frysinger wrote: > it isn't uncommon for people to want to force the patch (-p#) or fuzz (-f#) > level when applying specific patches. but it is unusual that they want to > kill > off the extra options: -g0 -E --no-backup-if-mismatch. so i'd

Re: [gentoo-dev] RFC: an eclass for github snapshots?

2012-03-11 Thread Leho Kraav
On Monday, May 30, 2011 9:30:02 AM UTC+3, Michał Górny wrote: > > Right now, a quick 'grep -l github.*tarball' shows that there are about > 147 ebuilds in portage using github snapshots. This evaluates to 83 > different packages. > > The problem with github is that it suffixes the tarballs with >

Re: [gentoo-dev] Six month major project on Gentoo

2011-12-14 Thread Leho Kraav
i'd be really happy if someone took care of https://bugs.gentoo.org/150031 :> "include more info about binpkg in file name"

Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation

2011-12-04 Thread Leho Kraav
On Sunday, December 4, 2011 4:50:02 PM UTC+2, Leho Kraav wrote: > > * fork my own user.eclass from v1.17, modify it to use --root $ROOT when > calling shadow stuff So first thing I'm running into is replacing getent with something that supports chrooting. Only immediate though

Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation

2011-12-04 Thread Leho Kraav
So after a reading through a bunch of stuff [1][2][3][4][5], what I'm going to do for the goal above is: * move to sys-apps/shadow trunk [6] * fork my own user.eclass from v1.17, modify it to use --root $ROOT when calling shadow stuff * stick my user.eclass into myoverlay/eclass/ * # echo "l

Re: [gentoo-dev] user management mitigation

2011-12-03 Thread Leho Kraav
Mike, can you offer a tip on how to "trivially hook into whatever craziness" with the help of user.eclass? My goal is to have regular enewuser and enewgroup work for ROOT=/xyz. But I don't currently have a clue what would *not* be a horribly broken way to do this. It seems like I perhaps should

[gentoo-dev] Proposal: include dbus session handling in baselayout (or somewhere, in which case where?)

2011-04-30 Thread Leho Kraav
every time you open a new shell in tmux or whatnot since Subversion needs dbus to communicate with keyring. /etc/profile.d/dbus-session.sh attached, looking for feedback about problems with it and if the whole approach even makes sense. I might be not knowing something important. -- Leho