On 5/21/19 3:08 AM, Sergei Trofimovich wrote:
> On Mon, 20 May 2019 16:41:56 -0500
> "Jory A. Pratt" wrote:
>
>> Please review the proposed changes for musl support. We would like to
>> get this landed on the tree ASAP so we can drop the eclass from the musl
>&
On 5/20/19 4:41 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> + *-musl*)
> + confgcc+=( --enable-__cxa_atexit )
> + ;;
As Zorry noted in #Gentoo-hardened, we do not support anything less then
GCC-8 for musl right now so no need to add the stable ssp/pie blocks.
diff --git
Please review the proposed changes for musl support. We would like to
get this landed on the tree ASAP so we can drop the eclass from the musl
overlay. This is one of the first steps to getting things moved to tree
so we can depreciate the overlay.
Thanks,
Jory
diff --git a/eclass/toolchain.eclass
mitz.
>
This is a mess, many systems are setup with portage already on a
seperate partition for reasons. What advantage does it provide to move
the tree now after all these years? I have seen nothing more then lets
do this cause I like the ideal lately and it is getting old, there is no
benefit that would justify moving the tree or many other changes that
are being made in Gentoo lately.
--
===
Jory A. Pratt
Gentoo Linux Developer [Mozilla Lead]
E-Mail: anar...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : D4AC 8D63 0B16 F7C9 08E9 B909 A0CC C3BA B4D0 88B4
GnuPG ID : B4D088B4
===
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
===
Jory A. Pratt
Gentoo Linux Developer [Mozilla Lead]
E-Mail: anar...@gentoo.org
GnuPG FP : D4AC 8D63 0B16 F7C9 08E9 B909 A0CC C3BA B4D0 88B4
GnuPG ID : B4D088B4
===
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
As many of you are aware we are using esr ( extended service releases
) for stable. We will remove all versions prior to 31.x in 7 days. If
you are needing an older version please let us know and we will try to
accommodate all users as much as possib
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 12/13/2012 12:48 PM, Tomáš Chvátal wrote:
>
> But there is one big ass but. We have some packages that were
> stabilised last time few year back and they provide multiple testing
> versions on top of that.
> Who is the one to deterimine which one s
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As many of us are aware the tree is growing to a size that is really
unacceptable for many. We have many packages that have excessive amounts
of versions laying around that are not used any more. Many of these
packages with excessive revisions most li
tting
> my time in adding the updated xulrunner to tree...
>
> A bit disappointing overall.
>
> - Samuli
>
>
Goes to show you do not understand what you are talking about. The
only way to use libxul from version 5 on would have been to provide a
symlink into firefox/thun
On 07/23/2012 07:07 PM, Jorge Manuel B. S. Vicetto wrote:
> Hi.
>
> I propose to commit this news item in 2 or 3 days. Does anyone have
> any comments about it?
> The idea is to show this news item on all Gentoo systems. Is that even
> possible / desirable?
> I've talked with both the PR and Docs
On 03/16/2012 07:05 AM, Christoph Niethammer wrote:
>
> * Unused and undocumented USE flags:
> --
> amd64
> mudflap
> sysfs
>
amd64 is never documented, it is defined by arch being built for,
mudflap is used by gcc, sysfs I believe is a dead useflag. Maybe someone
else can comment on it.
On 05/09/2011 06:23 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> As many of you are aware, the Mozilla team is extremely thin. We are
> currently looking for a few new developers and even current developers
> to assist the herd with -bin packages. As my time is spent with source
> builds of XULRunner
As many of you are aware, the Mozilla team is extremely thin. We are
currently looking for a few new developers and even current developers
to assist the herd with -bin packages. As my time is spent with source
builds of XULRunner,Thunderbird,Firefox,icecat,seamonkey, and
spidermonkey I do not have
> + eqawarn "QA Notice: Your patch has relative paths."
> + eqawarn " In the future this will cause a failure."
> + eqawarn "${rel_paths}"
> + fi
>
> # Dynamica
transcode and
imaging.
- --
==
Jory A. Pratt anarchy -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo Mozilla Lead
GPG: 2C1D 6AF9 F35D 5122 0E8F 9123 C270 3B43 5674 6127
==
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE
ng the -bin
package you should include them yourself, and set the launch script to
read its install dir before system dir, this is just how we resolve such
issues with firefox-bin.
- --
======
Jory A. Pratt anarchy -at- gentoo.org
Gent
always join #gentoo-base and provide patches and
help resolve known issues.
- --
==
Jory A. Pratt anarchy -at- gentoo.org
Gentoo Mozilla Lead
GPG: 2C1D 6AF9 F35D 5122 0E8F 9123 C270 3B43 5674 6127
==
via a wrapper script. You should be able to pass system plugins
dir from a wrapper script upon launch this is possible in firefox; this
is possible in firefox but easier to just sed the change myself via
ebuild and be done with it.
- --
==
Jory
gentoo-dev channel, I just announced I am
gonna be looking at the openrc code and fixing the bugs and working to
continue the development. Anyone that is interested in helping please
feel free to contact me off list to discuss how we will handle getting
openrc back on track.
- --
===
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Thu, 06 Jul 2006 14:31:56 -0700 Joshua Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
> | Or instead of throwing a hissy fit yourself about diego not agreeing
> | with you..I don't know you could go and show the way that you feel it
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ned Ludd wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-06-30 at 19:39 -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
>> As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
>> will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
>> so
As many are aware by now mozilla{-bin} are full of security issues. I
will be p.masking them tonight along with gecko-sdk. This is gonna cause
some issues with stable tree I am aware of this. As packages break
please reference bug http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137665 If
you are able to pro
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Henrik Brix Andersen wrote:
> Hi Jory,
>
> On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 09:29:51PM -0500, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
>> Security team can do as they wish, they do not take the user to mind
>> when they want to make hasty decision, withou
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As most are aware I was only active dev in mozilla herd. I have decided
that it is time to leave gentoo, which leaves herd unmaintained.
Security team can do as they wish, they do not take the user to mind
when they want to make hasty decision, without
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
spradlim wrote:
> I have a question that I havn't been able to find that is somewhat
> related to the following email. I know and understand Linux very well.
> I also know how ebuilds work. So how do I go about maintaining packages
> and getting them
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As those who use yahoo are aware the YCHT protocol has finally been
killed completely. Mangesium will be removed from the tree, as upstream
will not be making any further releases ( I am upstream ). I will p.mask
as long as noone has any objections for
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
If you are a dev and would like to help with mozilla herd please step
up and help in maintaining mozilla/seamonkey/thunderbird/enigmail and
all other ebuilds owned by the herd.
If your not a dev and would like to help out find me, you
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As many are aware nss-3.11 and nspr-4.6.1 are in the tree. Many
packages still set the {nss|nspr}-libs and includes. With nss-3.11 and
nspr-4.6.1 the proper configs and pkgtools files are included. Any
package in the tree that has them hardcoded in th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Daniel Glazman wrote:
> Jory A. Pratt gentoo.org> writes:
>
>>
>> As most are aware nvu has not had any activity in almost a year. Unless
>> someone steps up or has any valid reason we should continue to patch nv
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
As most are aware nvu has not had any activity in almost a year. Unless
someone steps up or has any valid reason we should continue to patch nvu
to keep it in the tree please speak up. If noone has any complaints I
will p.mask Wed. March 21 and
iD8DBQFD59BlGDfjNg8unQIRAvmpAKCLkQvKFtsGNvjgy7WnAUAvBTDZEACfbaRq
Y0s1we1Ata7QD0+LQfH8hVk=
=oREG
-END PGP SIGNATURE-
--- Begin Message ---
On 6-Feb-06, at 4:50 PM, Jory A. Pratt wrote:
Everything is straight forward when it comes to
building our firefox-source package compared to -bin you all
provide at
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> Well I believe I have everything up to par. We have enabled canvas and
> svg support as default now. If you would find out if I can brand yet for
> our users please.Everything is straight forward when it comes to
>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Well I believe I have everything up to par. We have enabled canvas and
svg support as default now. If you would find out if I can brand yet for
our users please.Everything is straight forward when it comes to
building our firefox-source package compare
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Linux Java wrote:
> Hello list,
> I used gcc4.0.1 before
> and now downgrade to 3.4.5
> now I when I compile a program it end with:
>
> libtool: link: cannot find the library
> `/usr/lib/gcc/i686-pc-linux-gnu/4.0.1/libstdc++.la'
>
> and the copilatio
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Jory A. Pratt wrote:
> As I am being hounded by genstef and users for this in the tree, I am
> making one more attempt to give everyone a chance to give input on
> mozextension.eclass . If I hear nothing of major issue would like to add
>
As I am being hounded by genstef and users for this in the tree, I am
making one more attempt to give everyone a chance to give input on
mozextension.eclass . If I hear nothing of major issue would like to add
to the tree on the 8th of January.
http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/eclass/mozextension.ec
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Unless there are any major objections tomorrow night I will commit
mozextension.eclass to the tree. You can find mozextension.eclass at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/eclass . You can also find the firefox
and firefox-bin ebuilds at http://dev.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yes one more extention for mozilla ebuilds, and possible others. The
purpose behind the eclass is to allow us a way to install locales for
firefox/thunderbird/firefox-bin/thunderbird-bin without causing a major
headache.
The eclass is derived from wor
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Mark Loeser wrote:
> Basically what I'm looking for here is an easy to understand explanation of
> what textrels are, why they are bad, and why they should hold back marking a
> package stable. The only information I've been able to find states that t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have found a restrictions in out mozconfig-2 eclass. Splitting the
eclass core configuration out to a seprate eclass will fix the
restrictions. I have placed the eclasses at
http://dev.gentoo.org/~anarchy/eclass for view. With the new mozcore
Lately I been the one handling all the vpopmail patches as soon as it
is feisible I will add it or you can submit a patch to be viewed and
possible added to the ebuild. Far as just joining the gentoo project
read the becoming a developer section
http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/devrel/handbook/ha
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Nathan L. Adams wrote:
> Jon Portnoy wrote:
>
>> I didn't say that.
>
>> I'm saying that (a) team leads do not want to waste their time in
>>
> such a
>> way just to give you warm fuzzies (b) devs do not particularly
>> want their team lead reviewing
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
I have sat here and read you all rant on and on about these
issues, but you still are not taking into account that when a bug is
marked worksforme or needmoreinfo that we are unable to replicate the
error. We are not saying that the bug does not ex
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
every single install has an issue with python-fchksum and gcc this
needs to be merged after python otherwise python calls the wrong
compiler. Hope we can get this fixed before our 2005.1 release.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU
44 matches
Mail list logo
