Nirbheek Chauhan wrote:
> 2011/5/18 Olivier Cr??te :
> > The main reason is that you want /run to be writable super early in the
> > boot process, before even / has been fscked and re-mounted. That means
> > you can do stuff like starting udevd in parallel with fsck of / which
> > means faster boo
Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Does this user/group need to be present on the build system for some
> reason?
Dunno about that package in particular, but for many packages, the build
process involves assigning ownership of certain files and folders to
particular users and groups. For that, you'd need t
Josh Saddler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> s/writtten/written
>
> s/aggregrate/aggregate
>
> s/genitellia/genitalia
>
> app-doc/nightmorph, your spellchecking tool.
line 1: unterminated `s' command
s/$/\//
sys-apps/sed, your stream editing tool.
--
There are problems in today's world that ca
Samuli Suominen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to add USE modplug to use.desc. I'll do it tomorrow,
> unless someone objects.
>
-- snip packages --
Do those packages use the modplug flag to enable libmodplug support in
lieu of (or in addition to) some other means of playing MOD files, or d
Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You are of course, free to ignore any and all suggestions offered; but
> you are not allowed to silence them.
:0:
* Subject:.*\[gentoo-dev\].*\[gentoo-commits\]
/dev/null
would neatly ignore the suggestions offered as well as creating relative
silence.
--
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 18:05 Sun 14 Oct , Konstantin Arkhipov (voxus) wrote:
> > 1.1 dev-php5/onphp/onphp-0.10.6.ebuild
> >
> > file :
> > http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/gentoo-x86/dev-php5/onphp/onphp-0.10.6.ebuild?rev=1.1&view=markup
> > plain
Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 13:36 Sat 13 Oct , Matti Bickel (mabi) wrote:
> > if kernel_is gt 2 6 20 ; then
> > epatch "${FILESDIR}"/${PV}-register_sysctl_table.patch
> > fi
> >
> > if kernel_is ge 2 6 22 ; then
> > epatch "${FILESDIR}"/$
Alexis Ballier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this might be worth discussion also (and make me even more late on my
> schedule with merging texlive, but I knew I'd be)
>
> In my overlay I was using a dev-texlive category for the texlive
> modular texmf ebuilds
> [as a side note :
> dev-tex
Jan Kundr?t <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tobias Klausmann wrote:
> > For those apps that need an editor, one could think of editor=vim.
>
> USE flag change usually triggers a rebuild of the package in question. I
> certainly don't want to rebuild packages just because I switch $EDITOR.
If there's
Pierre-Yves Rofes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, August 3, 2007 2:07 am, Robin H. Johnson wrote:
> > The upstream rules_du_jour folk have had issues over the last few
> > months with DDoS and other attacks. Additionally, the nature of
> > their original update mechanism causes a lot of traffi
"Marijn Schouten (hkBst)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've encountered a few cases where the build process requires building
> and installing something and then using that to build something else.
> Is there a standard way to do this?
Perhaps you could build the build tools and install them to so
Wernfried Haas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 27, 2007 at 07:54:00AM +0200, Steffen Brumm wrote:
> > and darwin is satan, other beliefs than christianity - death
> > penalty, fight the sciences, womans have to go behind the cooker or
> > into the open flame, only conservapedia is real,...
Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any objections to globalizing the 'gs' use flag on support for ghostscript?
> [-] gs (app-office/rabbit):
> Ghostscript support
>
> [-] gs (media-gfx/graphicsmagick):
> enable ghostscript support
>
> [-] gs (media-gfx/imagemagick):
> enable gho
Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose a new herd: religion. The herd would take care of
> the Bible and religious software along with any genealogy programs in
> the tree, which there actually are a few of.
I previously suggested "philosophy" as an alternate name, as that wo
Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd like to propose a new herd: religion. The herd would take care of
> the Bible and religious software along with any genealogy programs in
> the tree,
Genealogy is a religion?
How about calling the herd "philosophy" or some such? That would better
inclu
Tristan Heaven <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-01-13 at 00:53 +0900, Georgi Georgiev wrote:
> > # These are games... no idea why, input appreciated
> > games-board/ggz-txt-client
> > games-board/ggz-sdl-games
> > games-board/ggz-gtk-games
> > games-board/ggz-kde-games
> > games-board/gnuc
Steve Dibb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Marcelo Goes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (07 Jul 2006)
> # Pending removal
> # Please migrate to net-wireless/aircrack-ng
> net-wireless/aircrack
> # net-wireless/aircrack for bug(s) 152806 Use aircrack-ng
> net-wireless/aircrack
I'm sure it doesn't truly matt
Petteri R??ty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sven K??hler kirjoitti:
> > i had some orphaned files in /etc/udev/rules.d. Namely 40-fuse.rules
> > and 60-fuse.rules.
> >
> > The files were never removed, since they are protected - aren't
> > they?
>
> Yeah config protected files are never removed. T
Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tuesday 07 November 2006 15:59, Aron Griffis wrote:
> > > +if [[ $'\n'$(get_mounts) =~ $'\n'${svcdir}\ && -w ${svclib} ]] ; then
> >
> > Shouldn't this be:
> >
> > if [[ $'\n'$(get_mounts) == $'\n'"${svcdir} " ...
> >
> > because I don't think you wa
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> stop spamming this shit and go read the mailing list page like i said
> already: http://www.gentoo.org/main/en/lists.xml -mike
I think someone is yanking your chain, vapier. You're replying to a
message that I didn't see on the list. Also, while this rep
Harald van D??k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 16, 2006 at 10:17:00AM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> > Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > > > Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very
>
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Stephen Bennett napsal(a):
> > Please, try to stay on the right mailing list. It's very annoying
> > when you don't...
>
> No matter how hard I try, I always hit the _retarded_ behaviour of the
> _one_ mailing just that just _has_ to be special for _no_ appar
Christian Heim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> # Alec Warner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (27 Aug 2006)
> # Masking media-radio/xlog for treecleaners and bug(s) # 88580
> # Sept 27th for removal
> media-radio/xlog
>
> Punted.
So, why was this one punted, anyway? The bug was fixed in the new
version, and an
Zac Medico <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Portage currently has two hard-coded lists of variables that control
> the behavior of env-update. I'd like to make these variables
> configurable so that package maintainers have direct control over
> them. The variables break down into two basic types: co
Richard Fish <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A question [1] has come up on -user about why some ebuilds take so
> long to become stable for an arch.
> So my question is: is there anything that interested users can do to
> help here? I know we can file stabilization bugs, but I agree with
> Robert [1
Ned Ludd <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Not 100% sure about the noexec part as that might break upx which
> calls /proc/self/exe as part of it's decompresser routines.
/proc/self/exe is a symlink, and the permissions of symlinks aren't used
for anything. It's less than trivial (and I think impossi
Harald van D??k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 16, 2006 at 11:31:27PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> > Harald van D??k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Any is fine, there is no word splitting or wildcard expansion in
> > > shell variable ass
Harald van D??k <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Any is fine, there is no word splitting or wildcard expansion in
> shell variable assignments.
$ foo="bar * baz"
$ wombat=$foo
$ echo $wombat
bar somedir somefile baz
--
^
^
Thomas Cort <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What is the proper quoting style for using epatch? In the tree there
> are about 3 different styles...
> What is the proper quoting style for defining the S variable? In the
> tree there are about 3 different styles...
It might be prudent to quote the varia
Matteo Azzali <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> * (I'm not sending mails through gentoo.org account cause
> http://www.gentoo.org/proj/en/infrastructure/dev-email.xml asks me to
> not use it to send mails "unless absolutely necessary." , and I have
> others mean of sending emails.
Grant Goodyear <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps it's time to split off a thread or two...?
Perhaps, even a meta-thread!
--
Each night Father fills me with dread
When he sits on the foot of my bed.
I'd not mind that he speaks; In gibbers and squeaks,
But for the seventeen years he's b
Edward Catmur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 2006-04-28 at 14:01 -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> > You shouldn't need to completely override src_compile for just that. All
> > you'd need to do is set EXTRA_ECONF appropriately.
> No, EXTRA_ECONF is for end-
"A. Khattri" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Apr 2006, Chris White wrote:
> > On Friday 28 April 2006 12:41 pm, A. Khattri wrote:
> > > In writing and testing a new ebuild, I ran emerge as root and got
> > > ACCESS DENIED errors when it tried writing two config files into
> > > /etc.
> > >
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 22, 2006 at 12:36:53PM -0700, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> > Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in the
> > next few weeks?
>
> What does that have to do with ibm-acpi? The module doesn'
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The kernel module found in app-laptop/ibm-acpi has been included in
> the vanilla kernel since linux-2.6.10. There has been no releases of
> the stand-alone module since March 2005.
Is Gentoo planning on eradicating the 2.4 kernel from the tree in
Paul de Vrieze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 24 February 2006 15:19, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
[snip]
> > To avoid this, ensure that your packages use versioned SRC_URI
> > component names, and that the name part is something that's
> > reasonably likely to be unique (e.g. includes the packag
William Hubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I can get them to build outside an ebuild fine, but I have found that
> festival #includes actual source files from speech-tools to
> instantiate c++ templates.
[snip]
> The other option would be to not keep speech-tools as a separate
> ebuild, but have th
Linux Java <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...
> How can I solve it?
...
> !!! Please attach the following file when filing a report to
> bugs.gentoo.org:
> !!! /var/tmp/portage/beagle-0.2.0/work/beagle-0.2.0/config.log
I would suggest searching Bugzilla or the forums, or asking on the
gentoo-user lis
Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 2006-01-18 at 06:27 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
> > Personally, no, but others do. I should have been less ambiguous (and
> > obnoxious) in my initial response. Please don't assume that just because
> > _you
Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Tue, 2006-01-17 at 20:18 -0800, Drake Wyrm wrote:
>
> > Portage is not the only important system tool. Some of us actually
> > use Perl. Please do not be with the breaking.
>
> Is this to say there is a valid need for
Joshua Baergen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm all for less cruft and more simplicity. As far as I know none of
> the Portage tools depend on Perl, so I don't really find a 'nuclear
> fallout has caused dynamic linking to be erratic' situation to be that
> important.
Portage is not the only i
Pawe?? Madej <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank Groeneveld wrote:
> > You probably have /sbin/shutdown set suid, because on all my Gentoo
> > boxes, normal users can't run it, only root can run it. (Permission
> > denied). What is the output of ls -al /sbin/?
> >
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~ $ ls -al /sb
Lares Moreau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> media-gfx/graphicsmagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> media-gfx/imagemagick:gs - enable ghostscript support
> media-libs/urt:gs - Add support for postscript
>
> Looking in these ebuilds, all:
> gs? ( virtual/ghostscript )
For how many of these might
Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Jan 2006 05:26:44 -0700 Duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> | That begs the question...
>
> No it doesn't.
>
> http://www.wsu.edu/~brians/errors/begs.html
>
> | Curious users want to know!
>
> Perhaps said curious users should go and take
Petteri R??ty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Petteri R??ty wrote:
> > R Hill wrote:
> >>Daniel Ahlberg wrote:
> >>>* if ebuild installs COPYING and/or INSTALL into doc.
> >>
> >>Is this actually important? There are a hell of a lot of ebuilds that fail
> >>under this rule. I'd like to start filing
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Dec 26, 2005 at 02:51:26AM -0500, Michael Sterrett -Mr. Bones.- wrote:
> > Like in here?
> >
> > app-doc/halibut/halibut-0.9.ebuild: BUILDDIR="${S}/build" \
> > net-dns/maradns/maradns-1.0.27.ebuild:BUILDDIR=${S}/build
Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> use.local.desc:app-text/ghostscript-afpl:jasper - Enable support for
> jpeg2k (jasper)
> use.local.desc:kde-base/kdegraphics:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k
> (jasper)
> use.local.desc:kde-base/kdelibs:jpeg2k - Enable support for jpeg2k
> (jasper)
> us
Kurt Lieber <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 05, 2005 at 04:40:28PM + or thereabouts, George Prowse
> wrote:
> > Is vendors.gentoo.org going to have the new redesign that curtis119
> > is implementating?
>
> The eventual plan is for all web sites residing under the *.gentoo.org
> doma
Jakub Moc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, I don't think so... If I want to enable a feature for one
> specific ebuild and a USE flag in /etc/portage/package.use pulls in a
> dep, that in turn enables that use flag globally, it's obviously not
> what I intended and forces me to add yet another -f
Chris Gianelloni <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Mon, 2005-10-17 at 22:52 +0200, dju` wrote:
> > Probably a silly question, but why choose nsplugin over
> > browserplugin?
This may not be a particularly _good_ reason, but "nsplugin" is already
an accepted global USE flag.
> At any rate, it is pr
"Josh M. Anders" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> subscribe
>
> --
> Josh M. Anders, MVP, MCSE+
> Senior System Administrator
> UNIX Expert
Oh, the irony...
--
I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme
foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in
lo
Brian Harring <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 26, 2005 at 03:49:35PM -0400, Kristian Benoit wrote:
[snip]
> > the EAPI would be an ebuild API definition. The equivalent to the XML's
> > dtd. The ebuild could point to a directory named
> > $PORTDIR/eapi// which would contain a python script
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> also, four tabs rule
I prefer single-character tabs. (0x09)
--
I used to think romantic love was a neurosis shared by two, a supreme
foolishness. I no longer thought that. There's nothing foolish in loving
anyone. Thinking you'll be loved in return is
Stuart Longland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Simon Stelling wrote:
> > Chris Gianelloni wrote:
> >>Filtering the lists leads to a slippery slope. What happens when
> >>you start getting false positives?
> >
> > True, but why not filtering binary attachments? *If* you have to
> > send an attachmen
Kristian Benoit <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I just checked and pkg_config does not handle make menuconfig correctly
> either :( Probably a bug.
Sorry I didn't tune into this thread earlier...
Most ncurses-based tools, including most menuconfig scripts, need to be
attached to an interactive ter
Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 01 July 2005 12:25 pm, Brian D. Harring wrote:
> > Currently, we pretty much leave out the big dogs of build depends from
> > ebuilds- basically we rely on the profile to require a suitable
> > toolchain. Couple of issues with this though-
>
>
Patrick Lauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-06-16 at 11:13 +0200, Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? wrote:
> > On Thursday 16 June 2005 10:53, Patrick Lauer wrote:
> > > Always a drag to see packages getting dropped, but if noone
> > > maintains them there's not much that can be done.
> > Well
Jason Stubbs <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Alec Warner wrote:
[...snip...]
> > >Thus you can do cool stuff like print debug info, over-ride default
> > >functions, and otherwise other fun stuff that normally would be a
> > >complete PITA, especially if you don't know portage internals well.
>
> N
Rene Zbinden <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am writing a new ebuild. The program contains a perlscript
> (mainprog.pl) which needs two perl modules like (module1.pm
> module2.pm)
>
> I will put mainprog.pl in /usr/bin but where do I put the two modules.
> Shall I put them in /usr/share/programenam
marduk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, 2005-05-21 at 22:28 +0200, Andrej Kacian wrote:
> > Are .keep files necessary in a live filesystem? AFAIK they're only
> > there to keep portage from removing a directory from emerge-time
> > image. Would it be possible to just remove them from live files
Rick Sivernell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I am operating a small IT service organization and I would like to put
> a link to Gentoo on my site. My ad:
[snip]
> If there is a standard ad that you would prefer, I will use it. This
> is a service for my clients use and reference. If you allow my lis
Henrik Brix Andersen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess I could go with a simple -rX bump, but that wouldn't really
> reflect what the ebuild is - and I'd hate to have to add either a live
> CVS ebuild or a brand new net-wireless/orinoco-usb ebuild, since that
> would duplicate functionality, add
At 2005-04-22T17:54:31-0400, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Friday 22 April 2005 05:49 pm, David Klaftenegger wrote:
> > Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > > On Fri, 22 Apr 2005 14:29:58 -0700 Drake Wyrm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > wrote:
> >
At 2005-04-21T13:06:57-0400, Mike Frysinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> we've had 'bc' and 'ed' around for historical reasons and because
> we've never actually tracked what packages invoke 'bc' or 'ed' in
> their scripts
>
> psm has looked into this and found that nothing else in a typical
> `em
At 2005-04-22T08:38:22+0900, Georgi Georgiev <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> maillog: 21/04/2005-23:43:57(+0200): Diego 'Flameeyes' Petten? types
> > Same for ieee1394, usually enables support for
> > media-plugins/libdc1394, sys-libs/libavc1394 and/or
> > sys-libs/libraw1394.
>
> Considering that a
At 2005-04-14T09:32:59-0700, Donnie Berkholz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Reply to List hasn't even worked properly for me since switching to
> the new server or whatever. It duplicates to @gentoo.org and
> @lists.gentoo.org. I'd guess this has something to do with people
> sending to @gentoo.org w
Don't mind me... Just checking procmail recipes.
--
gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list
67 matches
Mail list logo
