Re: Fwd: [gentoo-dev] Please actively drop support for Qt5 wherever possible

2025-01-02 Thread Daniel Buschke
Am 02.01.25 um 12:13 schrieb Zoltan Puskas: So, removing Qt5 will break computers of many users, including my computer. In the course of many years of existence of Qt5 a large number of useful programs have been created; not all of them have been ported to Qt6. Are we going to throw away all

[gentoo-dev] TIDAL ebuild

2024-12-24 Thread Daniel Buschke
Hi all, TIDAL is a music streaming service. As I missed a TIDAL desktop app on gentoo I created an ebuild based on https://github.com/Mastermindzh/tidal-hifi. It's a node js application which drove me a bit crazy. I was today years old when I realized that the gentoo emerge sandbox is cutting

Re: [gentoo-dev] speeding up usage of portage in e-file / portage file list

2020-05-24 Thread Daniel Buschke
Am 24.05.2020 um 14:10 schrieb Daniel Pielmeier: Here the bash version takes around 2.9 seconds while the python version takes 3.2 seconds. Excluding the portage API it takes 2.8 seconds and also excluding the data query it takes 0.3 seconds. So in the python version the data query takes 2.5 seco

Re: [gentoo-dev] speeding up usage of portage in e-file / portage file list

2020-05-23 Thread Daniel Buschke
Am 23.05.2020 um 23:46 schrieb Daniel Pielmeier: Hm correct me if I am wrong, but from looking at the patch Zac provided I think he meant that the time portage consumes is only one second while the "rest" is 3.2 seconds. So there is probably a potential in improving the "rest" somehow. Yes an

Re: [gentoo-dev] speeding up usage of portage in e-file / portage file list

2020-05-23 Thread Daniel Buschke
Am 23.05.2020 um 22:55 schrieb Zac Medico: Since the portage API only added about 1 second to the python script time, I guess it's on par with your bash implementation. ;-P Yeah, if you substract the second for loading and the second for doing queries, then yes, it's pretty par with the bash i