On Tuesday 17 April 2007 23:42:36 Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2007 at 11:35:01PM +1200, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > I just hope we are not going to get overly 'precious' about this CoC
> > thing, which btw, I note contains the colloquial phrase 'If yo
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 22:32:34 Christian Faulhammer wrote:
> Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
> > > So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> > > brand new CoC, I do
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 16:01:46 Jakub Moc wrote:
> So Since devrel has been so kind and suspended me, based on our
> brand new CoC, I don't feel any need to stay on this project any more.
> I'm therefore resigning from this project.
I would be grateful if somebody could refer me to the arch
On Tuesday 17 April 2007 01:10:20 Chris Gianelloni wrote:
[ ... ]
> Yeah, ulimit won't do it. We hit this issue with mimedefang, actually.
> Our problem is that the kernel is doing the limiting. We ended up
> having to split things up a good bit into multiple processes to get
> everything workin
On Saturday 14 April 2007 18:14:48 Luca Barbato wrote:
> Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > What, you're saying they all ship with test suites that exist but don't
> > work?
>
> anything that takes more than 10m to test is broken from an user point
> of view: you want the application,
Indeed, but speaking
On Wednesday 11 April 2007 10:56:40 Benedikt Boehm wrote:
> ... don't care about an uber-vision or direction and just keep your
> friggin packages alive and working?
Indeed!!
Doing an emerge --deep --update world last week b0rked updating about a
couple of dozen packages. Evenutally I realize
On Sun, 08 Apr 2007 22:58:17 Jeffrey Gardner wrote:
> Michael Cummings wrote:
> > So, fellow devs, what's new with development?
>
> As for me, I'm fighting with jmol-11.0, an awesome java app that relies
> on a lot of bundled jars. I've been able to use local versions of:
> ..but finding sources I
On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 00:09:12 Wernfried Haas wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 05, 2007 at 09:26:41AM +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> > Unfortunately, what the GLEP doesn't do is prevent the Council from
> > having secret meetings and refusing to discuss not only the content of
> > those meetings but even the to
On Sunday 01 April 2007, Peter Volkov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> Path of some utilities in coreutils-6.7-r1 changed from /usr/bin to /bin
> and vice versa. This cause some scripts became broken as they relied on
> the full path to executable. The question is: does there exist best
> practice on how to avo
On Sunday 01 April 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-03-31 at 23:39 +0100, Steve Long wrote:
> > Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> > > That's uncalled for. There's no need to get nasty.
> >
> > I applaud your intent, but feel it would have far more effect on the
> > atmosphere if applied to a few
On Saturday 31 March 2007, Seemant Kulleen wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 23:41 +0200, Danny van Dyk wrote:
> > > In which case your Paludis fork of Gentoo will take off like a
> >
> > Please, pretty please with sugar atop: Stop this FUD about forking
> > Gentoo. Paludis is not a fork of Gentoo, it
On Saturday 31 March 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 21:13:18 +0100
>
> Roy Marples <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 18:50:59 +0100
> >
> > Ciaran McCreesh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > A few years ago Gentoo had some serious advantages over the
> > > competi
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:38:19 +1200
>
> Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > Care to suggest a different DSCM system?
> > >
> > > Care to suggest why the D part is necessary or even useful?
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Ciaran McCreesh wrote:
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 08:45:46 +1200
>
> Christopher Sawtell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > > > I believe
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 March 2007, Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > I believe Monotone ( as well as many others ) would do what is wanted.
>
> i simply cannot fully express myself at how terrible monotone is
Care to suggest a different DSCM
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Luca Barbato wrote:
> Stuart Longland wrote:
> > Portage itself, does take a long time to load its libraries. I'm yet to
> > try Paludis (I'm one of the few MIPS devs that doesn't use it yet), but
> > do hear good things about it. Perhaps some of the concepts used in
> > Palu
On Tue, 27 Mar 2007, Donnie Berkholz wrote:
> Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > On Monday 26 March 2007, bret curtis wrote:
> >> Only wimps use tape backup: *real **men* just upload their important
> >> stuff on *ftp*, and let the rest of the world mirror it. -- LT :1996
> >
> > actually, i wonder if this
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Mike Kelly wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 02:21:46 +0200
>
> Alin NÄstac <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Christopher Sawtell wrote:
> > > In which case it must be a feature, so why not use the keyword
> > > FEATURE?
> >
> > Wh
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007, Jakub Moc wrote:
> Kevin F. Quinn napsal(a):
> [snip]
>
> See, I don't really care how the reporter feels, if something's not a
> bug, then it's not a bug.
In which case it must be a feature, so why not use the keyword FEATURE?
> Don't invent confusing 'politically correct'
>
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007, Ioannis Aslanidis wrote:
> What I personally think out of all this situation is nice propaganda
> for Gentoo, which we could somehow exploit in 'our benefit'. Anyone
> with ideas on how to promote our distribution even with that kind of
> propaganda?
If nothing else, it does p
> TBH I think all that was needed was saying that the pre-existing rules
> apply to all on the dev m-l, and actually *enforcing* those rules for devs.
> Devrel is clearly not set up for that, so I support the new dev-mods (sorry
> proctors is a silly name imnsho as only Americans get it. I underst
21 matches
Mail list logo
