[gentoo-dev] Re: Announcing The Gentoo Common Lisp Project

2006-10-15 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Matthew, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Matthew Kennedy schrieb: > We hope users will contribute to our Darcs overlay instead of simply > filing bugs. I asked to include the overlay in the official layman configuration. V-Li -- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A

[gentoo-dev] Re: X.Org 7.1 is Stable

2006-10-14 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Joshua, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Joshua Baergen schrieb: > Sven Köhler wrote: >> Hmm, xorg-server-1.1* is stable now, but xorg-x11-7.1 is not. Did you >> forget that ebuild? ;-) > Sure did! I fixed it a while ago though, so re-syncing now should get > you the r

[gentoo-dev] Re: Resignation

2006-10-08 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Tim, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Tim Yamin schrieb: > So long, and thanks for all the fish... Even I hope you rethink it... V-Li -- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381 B69A A777 6A91 E999 350A AD7C 2B85 9DE3 http://www.gnupg.org/ -- gentoo-dev@gentoo.org mailing list

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Natanael Copa schrieb: > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 15:47 +0100, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: >> On Thu, 05 Oct 2006 16:39:50 +0200 Natanael Copa >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: | I'm initially only interested in >> maintaining packages whe

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide

2006-10-05 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Josh, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Josh Saddler schrieb: > Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: >> Most devs run ~arch > Says who? Did you pull that fact out of a hat, or something? Do you have > any hard numbers to back that statement?

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Natanael Copa schrieb: > On Thu, 2006-10-05 at 00:00 +0000, Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: >> Natanael Copa schrieb: >>> Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide

2006-10-05 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Ioannis, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Ioannis Aslanidis schrieb: >> - Make every dev a member of at least 1 arch team > That's a sound idea, that way some herds (see KDE) won't have to be > searching for testers in every arch because _strangely_ one of the most > da

[gentoo-dev] Re: Gentoo World Domination. a 10 step guide

2006-10-05 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Thomas, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Thomas Cort schrieb: > Every developer should have access to at least 1 Gentoo system. They > should also be able to determine if something is stable or not. It would > cut down on the number of keyword/stable bugs if developers

[gentoo-dev] Re: Proxy maintainers

2006-10-05 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Natanael, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Natanael Copa schrieb: > Can I become a Gentoo dev, even if I'm only maintainer of 1-3 packages? > I'm trying to be realistic. You can. And you can even keep out of dev fights here on the mailing list. On IRC you normally

[gentoo-dev] Re: treecleaner removals

2006-09-28 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach David, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) David Grant schrieb: > On 9/28/06, Michael Cummings <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> +++ Mark Stier [28/09/06 15:35 +0200]: >>>How about entering the removed ebuilds into bugzilla under an adequate >>>section? >> I think my origin

[gentoo-dev] Re: New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-20 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Ramon, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Thanks for that post. Ramon van Alteren schrieb: > 9. Most of this mail has been on policies, expected behavior and > perceived behavior. I would like to get this discussion back to > technical issues wrt to generating stages/see

[gentoo-dev] Re: New project: Gentoo Seeds

2006-09-20 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Andrew, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Andrew Gaffney schrieb: >> As somebody's already mentioned, the embedded project releases GNAP and >> has a releng liaison. There's no reason the seeds project couldn't also >> have a releng liaison, which seems to resolve the ma

[gentoo-dev] Re: compiz

2006-09-16 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Joshua, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Joshua Baergen schrieb: > Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: >> So Gnome 2.16 will use AIGLX in Metacity? > Not by default. The support wasn't deemed 100% yet and thus slipped to > 2.18.

[gentoo-dev] Re: compiz

2006-09-16 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Hanno, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Hanno Böck schrieb: > Now, with the release of mesa 6.5.1 and the xorg-server-1.1.1-r1 ebuild > we have a well-working aiglx-implementation in gentoo. So Gnome 2.16 will use AIGLX in Metacity? V-Li -- Fingerprint: 68C5 D381

[gentoo-dev] Re: Why you use Gentoo

2006-09-07 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Chris, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Chris White schrieb: > So, wondering why people use Gentoo. Put [dev] or something if you're an > actual gentoo dev and [user] if you're a user. Doesn't need to be fancy, > you can put "community" or something if that's all you

[gentoo-dev] Re: cdrtools license issues

2006-09-01 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Diego, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò schrieb: > On Friday 01 September 2006 02:00, Christian 'Opfer' Faulhammer wrote: >>  As Schily is not the only one who has contributed code to mkisofs he   >> can&

[gentoo-dev] Re: cdrtools license issues

2006-09-01 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Diego, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Diego 'Flameeyes' Pettenò schrieb: >> as well as linking mkisofs to libscg, which he relicensed to CDDL >> lately. > This is a bit more debatable, he *can* link it, if he can change mkisofs > license to allow linking to non-GPL-co

[gentoo-dev] Re: cdrtools license issues

2006-09-01 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Lars, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Lars Weiler schrieb: > * Carsten Lohrke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [06/09/01 14:44 +0200]: >> Imho we have to remove the partly and incompatible relicensed >> cdrtools-2.01.01 alpha ebuilds from the tree. > I don't think so. > We have a l

[gentoo-dev] Re: Future of tetex

2006-08-25 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Gabriel, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Gabriel Lavoie schrieb: > About the texmf tree, is there really many packages that would be > included in each distributions? Would a modular ebuild system like the > one used by Gnome (emerge gnome and emerge gnome-lite) and X.

[gentoo-dev] Re: Xmms needs to die.

2006-08-23 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Luis, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Luis Medinas schrieb: > If noone takes it will be saved on overlays.gentoo.org. Everyone needs > to know that xmms is old and tired (obsolete). Having discussed Gentoo Status in this list: Maybe you should announce that in GWN

[gentoo-dev] Re: Make FEATURES=test the default

2006-08-19 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Hanno, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Hanno Böck schrieb: > I'm all for making more use of features like test and collision-protect, > though in the past I noticed that many devs don't seem to care much. I > even think to remember of bugs getting closed invalid with a

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-11 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Jeroen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Jeroen Roovers schrieb: > One solution might be to open your own AT bug, make the stabilisation > bug depend on it, and use the AT bug to have ATs post their `emerge > info`. Then, when testing and stabilisation is finished for y

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-11 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Jeroen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Jeroen Roovers schrieb: > Inlining emerge info in comments bloats the e-mail message to roughly > 2.5 times the normal size. I could have spoken out to get AT comments > banned altogether or to urge arches with AT teams to find a

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-11 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Matti, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Matti Bickel schrieb: > Once there was the idea of putting AT testing system specs somewhere, so > arch devs could actually see what we're running. Is this still needed or > is the number of ATs small enough to keep that in head-R

[gentoo-dev] Re: RFC: AT emerge info cruft > attachments on bugs.g.o

2006-08-11 Thread Christian &#x27;Opfer' Faulhammer
Tach Jeroen, 0x2B859DE3 (PGP-PK-ID) Jeroen Roovers schrieb: > I propose the `emerge --info` included in arch testers' comments on > stabilisation bugs should rather be posted as attachments. The AT > comments clog up the bugs and are usually not interesting at all