Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-14 Thread Alex McWhirter
Why does any discussion revolving around systemd always turn out like this? For the record, I'm an OpenRC user and intend on keeping it that way for as long as i can. In that case i need udev to keep things working the way i want them to. So in the case that the systemd team makes udev inseparable

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-09 Thread Alex McWhirter
On 02/09/2016 05:39 PM, Duncan wrote: > I'd agree, except that the way we're running udev is strongly discouraged > and generally not supported by upstream, with a statement that it /will/ > break in the future, it's simply a matter of time. > > Which makes a big difference when supporting that

Re: [gentoo-dev] Changing order of default virtual/udev provider

2016-02-08 Thread Alex McWhirter
On 02/08/2016 07:07 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: > > Sure, but if you've already picked which one you want as your default > at install time, then you won't have one pulled in as a default. If a > package does pull in the virtual and you didn't want it installed at > boot, chances are the package won't