[gentoo-dev] openrc 0.12 - netifrc/newnet mix-up

2013-12-01 Thread Alessandro DE LAURENZIS
quot; network stack. The other two cases need a clarification: 3) -netifrc -newnet: no network stack?!? 4) netifrc newnet: ??? This should be definitely documented somewhere (I didn't find anything). And, the last question: what's the point to have two flags instead the good old one? Tha

Re: [gentoo-dev] vim and gvim package split

2013-11-01 Thread Alessandro DE LAURENZIS
ally, I always though to vim as the system's "non-minimal" vi flavor, reserving the "minimal" role to vi from busybox, but I can agree that a minimal vim (linking as less things as possible) which coexists with a full-featured gvim is a reasonable solution. So the

[gentoo-dev] Re: vim and gvim package split

2013-11-01 Thread Alessandro DE LAURENZIS
Kent Fredric gmail.com> writes: > Useflags have their perks for giving variations on behaviour, but having 3 > effective packages in one, governed by useflags, means you'll have 3 much > more tightly coupled packages, and the code will be much messier with > useflag conditionals to pull dependenc

[gentoo-dev] vim and gvim package split

2013-10-31 Thread Alessandro DE LAURENZIS
ng so? Thanks for your time -- Alessandro DE LAURENZIS [mailto:just22@gmail.com] LinkedIn: http://it.linkedin.com/in/delaurenzis