Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

2015-11-01 Thread Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим
> Perhaps there is a better choice of distribution for you if you are. Or you can just... use rsync.

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: ChangeLog

2015-11-01 Thread Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим
> Now how can this user display the ChangeLog for > a certain package? ``` git log -- pkg-category/pkg-name/ ``` // assuming user in portage directory or passed GIT_DIR with path to it. Although, it is only if user has successfully cloned/synced the repo ;) Which is hardcore quest when you're liv

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

2015-11-01 Thread Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим
> git clone --depth=1 (you can also put that into your repos.conf, the > option is called 'sync-depth'). --depth is also available for regular pulls. ``` $ LC_ALL=C git clone --depth=1 git://git.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git Cloning into 'gentoo'... remote: Counting objects: 113359, done. remote: Com

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

2015-11-01 Thread Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим
> You shouldn't use rsync anymore, it is inherently insecure. The git tree > is _properly_ gpg signed so you can verify it's correctness. > > With the following portage configuration/hooks, any user can run the > tree directly from git: > https://github.com/hasufell/portage-gentoo-git-config > > At

Re: [gentoo-dev] ChangeLog

2015-11-01 Thread Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим
And why don't just only generate them on rsync mirrors, but remove them from git repo (like was planned initially, AFAIRC)? 01.11.2015, 18:17, "Patrick Lauer" : > Ahoi, > > I'm getting mildly very irritated with the lack of easily accessible > ChangeLogs for our packages. > > Apparently updating

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-20 Thread Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим
> Some people from gamerlay have made clear that they are not really > interested in reviews, yet you want me to waste time on that? I bet, you misunderstand that position. It is a big difference between «users is not interested in review» and «users is not interested to follow the way like «som

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-20 Thread Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим
> * not related to the games team > * no review whatsoever from any dev on ebuilds that get pushed there It is easy-fixable. It is enough to gentoo-games team to back to work on it together with community. > * low quality low quality of what? ebuilds? I bet, it is many lower-quality ebuilds in t

Re: [gentoo-dev] official games repository

2013-10-20 Thread Мисбах-Соловьёв Вадим
Why not use gamerlay then? :D 20.10.2013, 19:17, "hasufell" : > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/20/2013 02:15 PM, Michał Górny wrote: > >>  Dnia 2013-10-20, o godz. 14:09:29 hasufell >>  napisał(a): >>>  what does the games team think of an official games repository? >>