There was a discussion in #gentoo-pms if we should drop the "domo"
install function in EAPI 9:
- It is not much used, only 6 packages (13 ebuilds) in the Gentoo
repository.
- Could you explain (e.g. to a new developer) what the function does,
without looking it up in the spec? :)
- The funct
Set the "quality" of all repositories but ::gentoo to "experimental".
The quality tag has not been used consistently in the past, and at this
point it is entirely meaningless.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
files/overlays/repositories.xml | 6 +++---
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions
Lower the status of a bunch of repositories to unofficial status.
The remaining "official" repositories are:
a. Gentoo developer overlays (of active developers)
b. project repositories of active Gentoo projects
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
files/overlays/repositories.xml | 26 +-
On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 17:51 +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > > One idea could be to merge these into a single status attribute, and
> > > maybe salvage the "core" value. That is:
> > >
> > > - core: Only the Gentoo repository (for the time bei
On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 12:59 +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > > > > > On Fri, 28 Mar 2025, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> > don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
>
> > That is, by quality:
>
> > core: gentoo [official]
> > stabl
Michał Górny posted on Fri, 28 Mar 2025 14:04:32 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 08:23 +, Duncan wrote:
>> Status:
>>
>> * "Official" status meant managed by an official Gentoo project or
>> developer (who had gone thru the usual vetting process), […]
>>
>> * "Unofficial" status
On Fri, 2025-03-28 at 08:23 +, Duncan wrote:
> Status:
>
> * "Official" status meant managed by an official Gentoo project or
> developer (who had gone thru the usual vetting process), […]
>
> * "Unofficial" status had rather less security-trust and was intended for
> "ordinary users". […]
On Fri, Mar 28, 2025 at 01:15:44PM +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote:
> On 2025-03-28, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> > don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
> >
> > That is, by quality:
> >
> > core: gentoo [official]
>
On 21/03/2025 14.32, Michał Górny wrote:
Hello, everyone.
TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
except for gentoo and guru.
Somewhat related: we may want to consider slightly raising the bar for
adding new (user) overlays. When mangling the overlay addition requ
Michał Górny posted on Fri, 28 Mar 2025 05:27:40 +0100 as excerpted:
> Hello,
>
> I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
>
> That is, by quality:
>
> core: gentoo [official]
> stable: opentransactions (?) [official (?!)]
On 2025-03-28, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've looked at our repositories.xml and the quality/status attributes
> don't seem to be used very meaningfully.
>
> That is, by quality:
>
> core: gentoo [official]
> stable: opentransactions (?) [official (?!)]
> testing: hyprland-overlay, moexia
Hello,
I no longer use it: app-text/txt2tags
No open bugs, but upstream is inactive for 2 years. It uses legacy
pre-PEP517 setuptools with some warnings.
Thank you,
Viorel.
OpenPGP_0x67992BD27934AEA4.asc
Description: OpenPGP public key
OpenPGP_signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digi
12 matches
Mail list logo
