On Tue, 2025-03-25 at 16:15 -0700, Jay Faulkner wrote:
> On 3/25/2025 1:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 08:46 -0400, Mitchell Dorrell wrote:
> > > I've been following the discussion, but I still don't know enough to have
> > > an opinion. Why was this infrastructure created in
On Sun, Mar 23, 2025 at 11:17:20AM +0100, Gerion Entrup wrote:
> Am Freitag, 21. März 2025, 14:32:31 Mitteleuropäische Normalzeit schrieb
> Michał Górny:
> > Hello, everyone.
> >
> > TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories,
> > except for gentoo and guru.
> >
> >
> >
On 3/25/2025 1:51 PM, Michał Górny wrote:
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 08:46 -0400, Mitchell Dorrell wrote:
I've been following the discussion, but I still don't know enough to have
an opinion. Why was this infrastructure created in the first place?
There's a number of reasons, and they are still vali
Hi,
Here's another batch of patches to distutils-r1. Aside from some
refactoring, it includes the following changes:
1. Lower bounds for most of the build systems were bumped to the lowest
stable versions in ::gentoo. This should match upstream requirements
better, especially that a few b
Add a DISTUTILS_UPSTREAM_PEP517 variable that drives the build backend
check, and can be used to override it when it is desirable to override
the backend used.
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/951944
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 30 ++
1
On Mon, 2025-03-24 at 08:46 -0400, Mitchell Dorrell wrote:
> I've been following the discussion, but I still don't know enough to have
> an opinion. Why was this infrastructure created in the first place?
There's a number of reasons, and they are still valid today:
1. Syncing against a mirror wit
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 100 +++--
1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 49 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index 02245424bff6..2eb6e3208082 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 5 -
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index e011502c01e6..8fc9ec5f568b 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -
Reflow distutils-r1_python_compile() to remove duplicate conditions
and improve readability.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 117 ++---
1 file changed, 56 insertions(+), 61 deletions(-)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass
Invert the eclass logic to map DISTUTILS_USE_PEP517 values to backends
rather than the other way around. This is in preparation for making
it possible to override the backend used. One side effect of this
is that in case of DISTUTILS_USE_PEP517 mismatch, we no longer provide
the "correct" value,
Add a dynamic component to the build directory used by setuptools,
to enable calling distutils-r1_python_compile multiple times without
having the builds share the same build directory (and therefore end up
being combined).
Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/951853
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
e
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 16
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
diff --git a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
index 21a2c79c1f71..e011502c01e6 100644
--- a/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
+++ b/eclass/distutils-r1.eclass
@@ -13
Add a hacky patched uv-build package that installs the upstream Python
modules without building another copy of uv.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
dev-python/uv-build/Manifest | 1 +
.../files/uv-build-0.6.9-use-uv.patch | 18
dev-python/uv-build/metadata.xml
This includes some important new features that packages are already
relying on -- PEP 639 licenses, PEP 621 metadata support in poetry-core.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 31 ---
1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
diff --
It is possible Gentoo could be hit by "legal" action when having this
package. Very unstable development, switches upstream to avoid "legal"
trouble. See also: bug #948196 bug #927392
Removal on 2025-04-25.
--
Have a great day!
~ Maciej Barć
https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/User:Xgqt
9B0A 4C5D 0
On Thu, 2025-03-20 at 13:08 +0500, Anna Vyalkova wrote:
> On 2025-03-18, Michał Górny wrote:
> > +Other Python implementations
> > +
> > +At the same time, we are also going to remove the target support
> > +for Python 3.10 (python3_10) and PyPy 3.10 (pypy3). If you wer
16 matches
Mail list logo
