Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] 1/1] autotools.eclass: add slibtool dir for aclocal

2025-03-22 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 3/14/25 11:31 AM, orbea wrote: > Changing it as you suggested I think would be significantly more > complicated and would require refactoring the eclass. Yes, it's unfortunately the type of thing that would be a somewhat involved change. :( > However I wonder if my patch still has merit sinc

Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-22 Thread Richard Freeman
On 3/22/2025 11:33 AM, Michał Górny wrote: On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 08:20 -0700, Jay Faulkner wrote: In the OpenStack community, we will put a final commit on HEAD of the primary branch removing all the content and putting an EOL notice in the readme (e.g. https://opendev.org/openstack/ironic-lib )

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: dev-libs/pigpio

2025-03-22 Thread Arthur Zamarin
# Arthur Zamarin (2025-03-22) # EAPI=7, uses legacy distutils non-PEP517 build, no reverse # dependencies, missing python compat bumps. Unmaintained in # Gentoo for more than 3 years. # Removal on 2025-04-21. Bugs #951854, #909910, #929427. dev-libs/pigpio OpenPGP_signature.asc Description: Op

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH api.g.o] repositories: Add the "sync" repos for gentoo & guru

2025-03-22 Thread Michał Górny
Add the "sync" sources for ::gentoo and ::guru repositories that provide the extra combined metadata and md5-cache. While arguably this is not the same thing, the list already includes rsync source which is actually closer to the "sync" repositories than the upstream repositories. --- files/overl

Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-22 Thread Michał Górny
On Sat, 2025-03-22 at 15:38 +, Sam James wrote: > Jay Faulkner writes: > > > On 3/21/2025 6:42 PM, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > > > On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Hello, everyone. > > > > > > > > TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror reposito

Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-22 Thread Sam James
Jay Faulkner writes: > On 3/21/2025 6:42 PM, Ionen Wolkens wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: >>> Hello, everyone. >>> >>> TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories, >>> except for gentoo and guru. >> Unfortunate, but just to say that

Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-22 Thread Jay Faulkner
On 3/21/2025 6:42 PM, Ionen Wolkens wrote: On Fri, Mar 21, 2025 at 02:32:31PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: Hello, everyone. TL;DR: I'm thinking of shutting down all gentoo-mirror repositories, except for gentoo and guru. Unfortunate, but just to say that I have nothing to say against dropping th

Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-22 Thread orbea
On Sat, 22 Mar 2025 08:01:58 +0100 Michał Górny wrote: > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:50 -0700, orbea wrote: > > On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:44:04 +0100 > > Michał Górny wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 07:12 -0700, orbea wrote: > > > > What does this mean for the libressl overlay? People use

[gentoo-dev] [RFC] Exposing sync/* repositories better

2025-03-22 Thread Michał Górny
Hello, everyone. TL;DR: should we expose "syncing" mirrors directly in our base repositories.xml? Per my previously announcement, I'd like to wind down the "public" service of mirroring all Gentoo repositories, and limit it to the few repositories we have control over -- at least ::gentoo and ::

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: app-office/gtg

2025-03-22 Thread Michał Górny
# Michał Górny (2025-03-22) # Stuck on Python 3.10, no reply from maintainer.  No revdeps. # Removal on 2025-04-21.  Bug #896608. app-office/gtg -- Best regards, Michał Górny signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Re: [gentoo-dev] The uncertain future of repository mirrors

2025-03-22 Thread Michał Górny
On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 16:50 -0700, orbea wrote: > On Fri, 21 Mar 2025 15:44:04 +0100 > Michał Górny wrote: > > > On Fri, 2025-03-21 at 07:12 -0700, orbea wrote: > > > What does this mean for the libressl overlay? People use that so > > > please don't remove it. > > > > It means people will hav