On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:32:54PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:18:49PM +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> > There was a discussion in #gentoo-pms if we should drop the "domo"
> > install function in EAPI 9:
> >
> > - It is not much used, only 6 packages (13 ebuilds) in the
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 06:18:49PM +0100, Ulrich Müller wrote:
> There was a discussion in #gentoo-pms if we should drop the "domo"
> install function in EAPI 9:
>
> - It is not much used, only 6 packages (13 ebuilds) in the Gentoo
> repository.
>
> - Could you explain (e.g. to a new developer)
Nowa Ammerlaan writes:
> On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>>> On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote:
Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100 as excerpted:
> I had really hope
# Andreas Sturmlechner (2025-03-20)
# Upstream have made clear that they are not going to port to Qt6 and
# recommend sys-apps/qdirstat (from original k4dirstat author) instead.
# Alternatively, there is kde-apps/filelight available.
# Bug #951138. Removal on 2025-04-19.
kde-misc/kdirstat
signatu
On 3/19/25 6:10 PM, Sam James wrote:
> If we're doing it orphaned, it should be done as hooks instead rather
> than with any integration in the ebuild, though. postinst / orphaned
> files are broadly a hack. Orphaned files break a bunch of invariants
> including Just Working for binpkgs properly.
>
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> writes:
> Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100 as excerpted:
>
>> I had really hoped to receive more comments on my earlier RFC. [...]
>> I really do want to know what others think so I can
>> make a better judgment on whether or not my idea is rea
On 19/03/2025 09:48, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2025 at 08:57:38AM +0100, Nowa Ammerlaan wrote:
On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote:
Nowa Ammerlaan posted on M
I've created a pull request that allows BDEPEND to be used in java-utils-2
https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/41168
I've tested it with all the Java ebuilds I use without any issues, so I
can check that the patch is correct.
Thank you very much.
On 19/03/2025 02:07, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 08:34:43PM -0400, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 03:14:13AM -, Duncan wrote:
Nowa Ammerlaan posted on Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:11:06 +0100 as excerpted:
I had really hoped to receive more comments on my earlier RFC
