Hi,
On 2025/03/14 14:22, Sam James wrote:
Arsen Arsenović writes:
Filip Kobierski writes:
On Monday, March 10th, 2025 at 21:40, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
Maybe sci-ai/ o
> On Sat, 15 Mar 2025, Andreas K Huettel wrote:
> ++ for sci-ai
> (Now, is it really sci-ai, or should we also come up with dev-ai (for
> libraries without explicit scientific context) and sys-ai (for accelerator
> device drivers) in addition? :)
The possibility that we could later add a de
Gordon Pettey writes:
> IMHO, "ai" is an extremely overloaded and over- and mis-used term.
> It's nothing but glorified pattern matching, and calling everything "ai"
> is very buzzwordy. I'd much rather see it named "ml".
Personally, I don't really care that a relatively well-understood word
has
