> On Mon, 10 Mar 2025, Maciej Barć wrote:
> W dniu 10.03.2025 o 23:42, Eli Schwartz pisze:
>> I don't understand your argument at all. "ml" is hardly a reserved
>> concept, and dev-ml exists precisely for "libraries and utilities
>> relevant to the ML programming language", which isn't going t
On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 04:37:50AM -, Duncan wrote:
> Ionen Wolkens posted on Sun, 9 Mar 2025 15:34:51 -0400 as excerpted:
>
> > On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 10:34:31PM -0500, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
> >> Sending this to dev ML in advance given it's simple and "probably"
> >> won't need to change the
Ionen Wolkens posted on Sun, 9 Mar 2025 15:34:51 -0400 as excerpted:
> On Sat, Mar 08, 2025 at 10:34:31PM -0500, Ionen Wolkens wrote:
>> Sending this to dev ML in advance given it's simple and "probably"
>> won't need to change the code further.
So the will-be-slot tracker bugs may in the (long)
On Mon, Mar 10, 2025 at 09:40:09PM +0100, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
> To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
> AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
> Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep-learning)
> The packages that I can move from dev-libs in the
On Monday, March 10th, 2025 at 21:40, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
> To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
> AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
> Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep-learning)
I really like thi idea.
For better or worse the field is
Hi!
Although maybe it should be sci-ml.
Let's _not_ use *-ml since for us ml stands for OCaml (which comes from
ML - "Meta langauge").
sci-ai, dev-ai, and app-ai (say, "app-ai/ollama"?) are nice IMO.
W dniu 10.03.2025 o 21:49, Eli Schwartz pisze:
On 3/10/25 4:40 PM, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
On 3/10/25 4:40 PM, Alfredo Tupone wrote:
> To declutter sci-libs and dev-libs from most of the "so called"
> AI packages I think that a new category should be created.
> Maybe sci-ai/ or dev-ai/ or sci-dl/ (deep-learning)
Of the three I favor sci-dl, since by and large these aren't really
about
