Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] sec-keys.eclass: new eclass

2024-11-29 Thread Eli Schwartz
On 11/29/24 1:31 PM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: > From a technical perspective, that depends on the keyserver design. > > But the canonical "why" is GDPR Article 17 - right-to-erasure. > > Hockeypuck even ships a script to make it easy for admins to delete > keys: > https://github.com/hockeypuck/hoc

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] sec-keys.eclass: new eclass

2024-11-29 Thread Robin H. Johnson
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:36:36AM -0500, Eli Schwartz wrote: > This doesn't test a useful property. > > People cannot "remove" compromised keys from a keyserver to begin with. > If they did, then checking to build the package with GENTOO_MIRRORS= > DISTDIR=$(mktemp -d) is a significantly more use

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] Add 'host' variable to GIT_CRATES to support other host like self-host gitlab or gitea

2024-11-29 Thread Ionen Wolkens
On Fri, Nov 29, 2024 at 01:42:40AM +, MYT wrote: > Hi Paul, > > thanks for the reply. To be honest I'm a bit confused about your suggestion > as I don't think I declared any new associative array. The patch only add new > value in the string with delimeter. So I'm not sure what you expect me