> On Thu, 27 Jun 2024, Andrew Nowa Ammerlaan wrote:
> On 27/06/2024 06:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> AFAICS, no EAPI 6 ebuild inherits mount-boot, so EAPI 6 could be
>> dropped?
> Yes, might as well drop that now. Here's v2:
> +# @FUNCTION: mount-boot_is_disabled
> +# @INTERNAL
> +# @DESCRIPT
On Wed, 2024-06-26 at 01:20 +0100, Sam James wrote:
> Arthur Zamarin writes:
>
> > Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to
> > organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me.
> > [...]
> > 32-bit arches
> >
> > This includes stable arches x86, ar
Duncan <1i5t5.dun...@cox.net> writes:
> Sam James posted on Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:06:12 +0100 as excerpted:
>
>> Arthur Zamarin writes:
>>
>>> As you all know, Gentoo supports many various arches, in various
>>> degrees (stable, dev, exp). Let me explain those 3 statuses fast:
>>>
>>> * stable arc
Sam James posted on Wed, 26 Jun 2024 01:06:12 +0100 as excerpted:
> Arthur Zamarin writes:
>
>> As you all know, Gentoo supports many various arches, in various
>> degrees (stable, dev, exp). Let me explain those 3 statuses fast:
>>
>> * stable arch - meaning we have stable profile for this arch
On 27/06/2024 06:07, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
IMHO "while true" would be better readable.
Adjusted, here's v2:
From 422fcc5fb53c3f2adf25256fb7d18a65e4036496 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Ammerlaan
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 16:12:39 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-install.eclass: move mount-bo
On 27/06/2024 06:00, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
AFAICS, no EAPI 6 ebuild inherits mount-boot, so EAPI 6 could be
dropped?
Yes, might as well drop that now. Here's v2:
From 9f6e912237bf1f67b3bb5341e64449a6b02703bc Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Ammerlaan
Date: Tue, 25 Jun 2024 15:08:49 +0200
