x86 FP issues (Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans)

2024-06-25 Thread Sam James
Arthur Zamarin writes: > Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to > organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me. > [...] > 32-bit arches > > This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and > maybe more. Those are in much

time64 & LFS for 32-bit arches (Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans)

2024-06-25 Thread Sam James
Arthur Zamarin writes: > Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to > organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me. > > 32-bit arches > > This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and > maybe more. Those are in much worse

On the value (or not?) of stable keywords (Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans)

2024-06-25 Thread Sam James
Arthur Zamarin writes: > Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to > organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me. > > [...] > 32-bit arches > > This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and > maybe more. Those are in mu

Misc arch plans (Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans)

2024-06-25 Thread Sam James
Arthur Zamarin writes: > Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to > organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me. > > [...] > > 32-bit arches > > This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and > maybe more. Those are in

Notion of stable depgraph vs stable keywords (Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans)

2024-06-25 Thread Sam James
Arthur Zamarin writes: > Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to > organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me. Absolutely - thanks for doing this. I'm going to split my replies with alt subject to help keep it organised. > > As you all know, Gentoo supports m

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans

2024-06-25 Thread James Le Cuirot
On Tue, 2024-06-25 at 20:33 +0300, Arthur Zamarin wrote: > x86 > > Stable 32-bit arch. I'll be honest, I don't believe at all this should > be stable arch anymore. I propose making it dev arch, and mass-dekeyword > stuff we got because of inertia. This arch is close to HW die. (l

Re: [gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans

2024-06-25 Thread matoro
On 2024-06-25 13:33, Arthur Zamarin wrote: So, are you ready for seeing the mess? Here we go. Thanks Arthur, I can add some input as another AT. 32-bit arches This includes stable arches x86, arm, ppc, sparc32, dev arches s390, and maybe more. Those are in much worse situat

[gentoo-dev] Arch Status and Future Plans

2024-06-25 Thread Arthur Zamarin
Hi all, this will be a long mail, and might be confusing, I'll try to organize it, but this is a mess, so bear with me. As you all know, Gentoo supports many various arches, in various degrees (stable, dev, exp). Let me explain those 3 statuses fast: * stable arch - meaning we have stable profile

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] java-utils-2.eclass: add --runtime-only argument to java-pkg_getjars

2024-06-25 Thread Florian Schmaus
Some packages only need the jar at runtime, not at compile time. For example https://bugs.gentoo.org/934659#c2 Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/934659 Signed-off-by: Florian Schmaus --- eclass/java-utils-2.eclass | 10 +++--- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/eclass/j