On 3/9/24 9:32 AM, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please consider the "legacy" build mode to be strongly deprecated, both
> in distutils-r1 and upstream (to the point that sole presence of
> packages installed that way triggers deprecation warnings elsewhere,
> sigh). Therefore, if you haven't don
On 3/9/24 2:59 PM, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 12:16 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>>
>> Make LTO filtering local to the compilation code. This avoids disabling
>> LTO for non-Python parts of an ebuild.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
>> ---
>> eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 4
>>
On 3/9/24 4:13 PM, Duncan wrote:
> I'm not saying don't use gentoo -- I'm a gentooer after all -- I'm saying
> gentoo simply isn't in a good position to condemn AI for its energy
> inefficiency. In fact, I'd claim that in the Gentoo case there are
> demonstrably more energy efficient practical
Michał Górny posted on Sat, 09 Mar 2024 16:04:58 +0100 as excerpted:
> On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 03:59 +, Duncan wrote:
>> Robin H. Johnson posted on Tue, 5 Mar 2024 06:12:06 + as excerpted:
>>
>> > The energy waste argument is also one that needs to be made
>> > carefully:
>>
>> Indeed. In
On Tue, Mar 5, 2024 at 12:16 PM Michał Górny wrote:
>
> Make LTO filtering local to the compilation code. This avoids disabling
> LTO for non-Python parts of an ebuild.
>
> Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
> ---
> eclass/distutils-r1.eclass | 4
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git
On Fri, 2024-03-08 at 03:59 +, Duncan wrote:
> Robin H. Johnson posted on Tue, 5 Mar 2024 06:12:06 + as excerpted:
>
> > The energy waste argument is also one that needs to be made carefully:
>
> Indeed. In a Gentoo context, condemning AI for the computative energy
> waste? Maybe someo
On Fri, 2024-03-01 at 07:06 +, Sam James wrote:
> Another person approached me after this RFC and asked whether tooling
> restricted to the current repo would be okay. For me, that'd be mostly
> acceptable, given it won't make suggestions based on copyrighted code.
I think an important questio
On Tue, 2024-02-27 at 18:04 +, Sam James wrote:
> I'm a bit worried this is slightly performative - which is not a dig at
> you at all - given we can't really enforce it, and it requires honesty,
> but that's also not a reason to not try ;)
I don't think it's really possible or feasible to rel
Hi,
Please consider the "legacy" build mode to be strongly deprecated, both
in distutils-r1 and upstream (to the point that sole presence of
packages installed that way triggers deprecation warnings elsewhere,
sigh). Therefore, if you haven't done that already, please look into
converting your pa
# Andrew Ammerlaan (2024-03-09)
# Requires pyside2/shiboken2, which is unmaintained upstream and
# not compatible with llvm-16 and up or python-3.12 and up.
# No upstream activity for 2 years.
# dev-python/QtPy is an alternative that does support Qt6.
# Removal on: 2024-04-09. Bug #926548
dev-py
10 matches
Mail list logo
