> On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 17:58 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> I cannot really see a delineation between app-text and [dev]-doc.
>>
>> For example, packages like psmark, xmlto, or even texi2html are general
>> format manipulation/conversion tools and I
On Sun, 07 Jan 2024 17:20:25 +0100
Michał Górny wrote:
> On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 09:50 -0500, Yuan Liao (Leo3418) wrote:
> > On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description:
> > >
> > > Build
we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg.
Should we merge these to one global useflag?
Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags.
See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634
What are your ideas?
We have also have a bunch of USE=pgp and USE=openpgp, both of which are
more co
On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 17:58 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > Here's another idea, a new dev-doc category (though I suppose we could
> > try to find a better name), dedicated to:
>
> > Tools to generate, convert, view and process documentati
Check for deprecated .egg and .egg-info files. While at it, fix stray
file check not to barf on *.egg files.
Signed-off-by: Michał Górny
---
metadata/install-qa-check.d/60python-site | 20
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+)
diff --git a/metadata/install-qa-check.d/60python-s
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> I cannot really see a delineation between app-text and app-doc.
Sorry, this should read "between app-text and dev-doc", of course.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
> On Sun, 07 Jan 2024, Michał Górny wrote:
> Here's another idea, a new dev-doc category (though I suppose we could
> try to find a better name), dedicated to:
> Tools to generate, convert, view and process documentation.
> This is notably meant to move software out of app-doc/ which is
>
From 0f33e78d05f5e50f4734f5493255232ce1c647fa Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Ammerlaan
Date: Wed, 3 Jan 2024 11:31:15 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] kernel-build.eclass: allow overriding UKI cmdline
Signed-off-by: Andrew Ammerlaan
---
eclass/kernel-build.eclass | 12 ++--
1 file changed
Part of https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/33727
From 0878f48e492b2c7bfd4b58c8f6dcfbfdbd642d8a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Andrew Ammerlaan
Date: Wed, 15 Nov 2023 19:59:06 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] eclass/(dist-)kernel-*.eclass: drop installkernel-gentoo-7
because we drop the generation of t
Hi,
Here's another idea, a new dev-doc category (though I suppose we could
try to find a better name), dedicated to:
Tools to generate, convert, view and process documentation.
This is notably meant to move software out of app-doc/ which is
specifically dedicated to "documentation collections"
# Michał Górny (2024-01-07)
# A Gentoo fork of an abandoned library that was historically used
# by app-office/libreoffice. No revdeps left.
# Removal on 2024-02-06. Bug #921576.
sys-devel/ucpp
--
Best regards,
Michał Górny
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 09:50 -0500, Yuan Liao (Leo3418) wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description:
> >
> > Build systems and related tools.
>
> Have you considered the name 'dev-builds
[2024-01-07 15:46:23+0100] Michał Górny:
Hi,
Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description:
Build systems and related tools.
Some candidates (there are more):
[snip]
sys-devel/gettext (not 100% sure about it)
I think that's the only one I wouldn't include as gettext
Hi!
Michał Górny writes:
> Hi,
>
> Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description:
>
> Build systems and related tools.
>
> Some candidates (there are more):
>
> dev-util/bazel
> dev-util/cmake
> dev-util/cmake-fedora
> dev-util/gn
> dev-util/gtk-doc-am
> dev-util/gyp
> dev-
This is already committed in kde overlay for testing (e.g. via eclass-
overrides).
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/920845
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner
---
eclass/cmake.eclass | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake.eclass b/eclass/cmake.eclass
index c29dcfe413..f4a0d
This is already committed in kde overlay for testing (e.g. via eclass-
overrides).
Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/920846
Signed-off-by: Andreas Sturmlechner
---
eclass/cmake.eclass | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/eclass/cmake.eclass b/eclass/cmake.eclass
index 41aebeee53..c29dc
On Sun, Jan 07, 2024 at 03:46:23PM +0100, Michał Górny wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description:
>
> Build systems and related tools.
Have you considered the name 'dev-buildsys'? More straightforward in my
opinion, with the cost of a longer length.
B
Hi,
Another idea for a new category: dev-build. Proposed description:
Build systems and related tools.
Some candidates (there are more):
dev-util/bazel
dev-util/cmake
dev-util/cmake-fedora
dev-util/gn
dev-util/gtk-doc-am
dev-util/gyp
dev-util/meson
dev-util/muon
dev-util/netsurf-buildsystem
On Sun, 2024-01-07 at 13:20 +, Sam James wrote:
> >
> > This was originally prompted by bug 920438 [1], pointing out that LLDB
> > and GDB belong to the same category. dev-util/ currently carries 428
> > packages, so I suppose it makes sense to split it some more, especially
> > when we can c
Michał Górny writes:
> [[PGP Signed Part:Undecided]]
> Hi,
>
> I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
> could be:
>
> Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.
Sounds good.
>
> Potential candidates include:
>
> [...]
dev-util/seer as well would be a good fi
Hi,
I'd like to propose adding a new dev-debug category. The description
could be:
Code debuggers and debugging-related tools.
Potential candidates include:
dev-util/ald: Assembly Language Debugger
dev-util/apitrace: Tool for tracing, analyzing, and debugging graphics APIs
dev-util/bpftrace:
21 matches
Mail list logo