Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] global USE=gpg

> On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, Andreas K Huettel wrote: >> > we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg. >> > Should we merge these to one global useflag? >> > >> > Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags. >> > See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634 >> > >> > What are your id

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 4/4] profiles/desc: Add cpu_flags_arm_sve

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/920474 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc b/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc index 2fe7fd904f81..029f3aa89aae 100644 --- a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 3/4] profiles/desc: Add cpu_flags_arm_i8mm

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917278 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc b/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc index 74626d687761..2fe7fd904f81 100644 --- a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/4] profiles/desc: Add cpu_flags_arm_asimddp

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/917277 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc b/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc index 9f3e60f72fd4..74626d687761 100644 --- a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/4] profiles/desc: Add cpu_flags_arm_sm4

Closes: https://bugs.gentoo.org/915624 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc b/profiles/desc/cpu_flags_arm.desc index da1b4ffd3496..9f3e60f72fd4 100644 --- a/profiles/

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] linux-mod-r1.eclass: Explicitly check for missing zstd

On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 10:27 -0500, Ionen Wolkens wrote: > On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 06:07:16AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > > --- > > eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass | 3 +++ > > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > > > diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass b/eclass/lin

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] global USE=gpg

> > we have many local gpg useflags which basically just enable gpg. > > Should we merge these to one global useflag? > > > > Additionally we have a few gpgme useflags. > > See also https://bugs.gentoo.org/679634 > > > > What are your ideas? > > > > We have also have a bunch of USE=pgp and USE=

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 2/2] linux-mod-r1.eclass: Explicitly check for missing zstd

On Sat, Dec 30, 2023 at 06:07:16AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Signed-off-by: Michał Górny > --- > eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass | 3 +++ > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass b/eclass/linux-mod-r1.eclass > index b6be4ba8a16d..4de2e3f89995 100644 > --- a/ecl

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] linux-mod-r1.eclass: Require the compression to succeed

On Sat, 2023-12-30 at 11:34 +0100, Ulrich Mueller wrote: > > > > > > On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, Michał Górny wrote: > > > - edob "${compress[@]}" -- "${@}" > > + edob "${compress[@]}" -- "${@}" || die > > Doesn't edob already die by itself? Oh, indeed it does. I misread the comment above then. I

[gentoo-dev] Official binary package hosting

Hi all, you may have already seen the announcement on the www.gentoo.org front page- our binary package hosting finally went "officially live". https://www.gentoo.org/news/2023/12/29/Gentoo-binary.html From the announcement: "To speed up working with slow hardware and for overall convenience,

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH 1/2] linux-mod-r1.eclass: Require the compression to succeed

> On Sat, 30 Dec 2023, Michał Górny wrote: > - edob "${compress[@]}" -- "${@}" > + edob "${compress[@]}" -- "${@}" || die Doesn't edob already die by itself? signature.asc Description: PGP signature