Re: [gentoo-dev] adding sec-keys/openpgp-keys-gentoo-release to @system

2023-08-12 Thread Rich Freeman
On Sat, Aug 12, 2023 at 10:34 AM Andreas K. Huettel wrote: > > I'd like to add > > sec-keys/openpgp-keys-gentoo-release > > to @system - any objections? > > This is more of a formal request since portage already depends on it anyway, > and > the package is present in every stage3. However, it i

[gentoo-dev] adding sec-keys/openpgp-keys-gentoo-release to @system

2023-08-12 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
Dear all, I'd like to add sec-keys/openpgp-keys-gentoo-release to @system - any objections? The package contains a single file (~20k) with the public keys used for stage, manifest, and binpackage signing. This is more of a formal request since portage already depends on it anyway, and the

Re: [gentoo-dev] Massive Github PR Queue

2023-08-12 Thread orbea
On Fri, 11 Aug 2023 18:37:10 -0500 Gordon Pettey wrote: > On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 11:11 AM Joonas Niilola > wrote: > > > > > Another big issue is as mjo pointed out, not everyone uses GH. > > > > "Not using GitHub" is not an excuse for a PR to sit ignored when it > has a bug attachment. Anyo

Re: [gentoo-dev] Massive Github PR Queue

2023-08-12 Thread Haelwenn (lanodan) Monnier
[2023-08-11 22:12:27-0400] Mike Gilbert: On Fri, Aug 11, 2023 at 21:18 Michael Orlitzky wrote: On Fri, 2023-08-11 at 10:35 -0700, orbea wrote: > > Perhaps the correct answer would be neither Bugzilla or Github? A mailing list (whose archives work :o) with git-send-email threads would be an im