Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 7.11.2022 8.07, Oskari Pirhonen wrote: > On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: >> I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually >> prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you >> mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugz

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Oskari Pirhonen
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 11:37:24 +0100, Piotr Karbowski wrote: > I would be in favour of stepping up the social contract and actually > prohibiting this kind of things, we had that before too, the nattka you > mgorny wrote is replacement for old bugzilla bot that was ... > closedsource and peris

[gentoo-dev] Looking for dedicated ModemManager maintainer

2022-11-06 Thread Matt Turner
The following packages are currently maintained by GNOME for no real reason other than they're a dependency of networkmanager: net-misc/modemmanager net-libs/libmbim net-libs/libqmi net-libs/libqrtr-glib But I don't have any ability to test them. I'd really appreciate a dedicated maintainer take

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 08:03:16PM +0100, Agostino Sarubbo wrote: > On domenica 6 novembre 2022 14:27:40 CET John Helmert III wrote: > > As far as I can tell, there's ONE person relying completely on a > > proprietary arch testing system. > > > > Ago, could you comment on this? What's blocking you

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 06.11.22 16:52, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 16:08 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: Fair point, and I suspected as much. Am I right that this does modify ~portage/.gitconfig (so usually /var/lib/portage/home/.gitconfig)? If so, I wonder if this could be avoided, e.g., by setting XD

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On domenica 6 novembre 2022 14:27:40 CET John Helmert III wrote: > As far as I can tell, there's ONE person relying completely on a > proprietary arch testing system. > > Ago, could you comment on this? What's blocking you from open sourcing > your software? Hi, I already answered in the previou

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Agostino Sarubbo
On domenica 6 novembre 2022 09:15:40 CET Michał Górny wrote: > On top of that, it seems that most of it still relies on proprietary > software and we have no clue how *exactly* it works, and it's really, > really hard to get a straight answer. I'm speaking for myself. I still use getatoms.py to fe

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: The Gentoo VDR Project is empty

2022-11-06 Thread Jonas Stein
Hi Martin, as I already have taken care about many packages from the vdr project, I will continue to do so. Thank you very much for your offer. This is great. Is there any progress on the discussion about [gentoo-project] RFC: "Trusted contributor model"? I think it makes no sense to have

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 16:08 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 06.11.22 12:38, Michał Górny wrote: > > On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 12:19 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > > On 06.11.22 12:03, Michał Górny wrote: > > > > Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership > > > > errors wit

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 06.11.22 12:38, Michał Górny wrote: On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 12:19 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: On 06.11.22 12:03, Michał Górny wrote: Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership errors with newer git versions when the checkout directory is accessed from src_install().

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread John Helmert III
On Sun, Nov 06, 2022 at 09:15:40AM +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > Arch testing's relying on automation a lot these days. Not saying > that's bad, if it improves the state of affairs. However, I have some > concerns, based on what I've seen lately. > > On top of that, it seems th

[gentoo-dev] Re: The Gentoo VDR Project is empty

2022-11-06 Thread Joonas Niilola
On 6.11.2022 11.49, Martin Dummer wrote: > Hi, > > as I already have taken care about many packages from the vdr project, I > will continue to do so. > > Is there any progress on the discussion about [gentoo-project] RFC: > "Trusted contributor model"? > > Meanwhile I continue to wait for an ans

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Michael Orlitzky
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 12:19 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > > I guess there is no way we can avoid the --global and use --local instead? > The setting is only respected if it's in the global ($HOME) or system (/etc) configs. There's no explanation for that in the man page, but it's probably beca

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
On Sun, 2022-11-06 at 12:19 +0100, Florian Schmaus wrote: > On 06.11.22 12:03, Michał Górny wrote: > > Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership > > errors with newer git versions when the checkout directory is accessed > > from src_install(). > > > > Bug: https://bugs.gen

Re: [gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Florian Schmaus
On 06.11.22 12:03, Michał Górny wrote: Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership errors with newer git versions when the checkout directory is accessed from src_install(). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/879353 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/git-r3.eclass | 5 +++

[gentoo-dev] [PATCH] git-r3.eclass: Add checkout dirs as "safe" directories

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
Mark all checkout directories as "safe" to avoid dubious ownership errors with newer git versions when the checkout directory is accessed from src_install(). Bug: https://bugs.gentoo.org/879353 Signed-off-by: Michał Górny --- eclass/git-r3.eclass | 5 + 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+) diff

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Piotr Karbowski
Hi, On 06/11/2022 09.15, Michał Górny wrote: On top of that, it seems that most of it still relies on proprietary software and we have no clue how*exactly* it works, and it's really, really hard to get a straight answer. I never understood how it become socially acceptable in open source pro

[gentoo-dev] Re: The Gentoo VDR Project is empty

2022-11-06 Thread Martin Dummer
Hi, as I already have taken care about many packages from the vdr project, I will continue to do so. Is there any progress on the discussion about [gentoo-project] RFC: "Trusted contributor model"? Meanwhile I continue to wait for an answer on my email to recruit...@gentoo.org from november 201

Re: [gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Sam James
> On 6 Nov 2022, at 08:15, Michał Górny wrote: > > Hi, everyone. > > Arch testing's relying on automation a lot these days. Not saying > that's bad, if it improves the state of affairs. However, I have some > concerns, based on what I've seen lately. Thanks for starting this discussion, I t

[gentoo-dev] Disturbing state of arch testing in Gentoo

2022-11-06 Thread Michał Górny
Hi, everyone. Arch testing's relying on automation a lot these days. Not saying that's bad, if it improves the state of affairs. However, I have some concerns, based on what I've seen lately. On top of that, it seems that most of it still relies on proprietary software and we have no clue how *

Re: [gentoo-dev] Status of Python 3.8

2022-11-06 Thread Anna V
On 2022-11-06 07:09, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, everyone. > > I think it's time to ask once again: how much do you need Python 3.8 > target to remain available in Gentoo? > > Right now we support four CPython targets: 3.8 through 3.11. 3.10 is > the current default, we're going to move 3.11 from

[gentoo-dev] The Gentoo VDR Project is empty

2022-11-06 Thread Joonas Niilola
Hey all, with the only member of VDR project gone, the project is currently essentially empty. https://wiki.gentoo.org/wiki/Project:VDR Please join the project to keep it alive. We may have some help through the proxy-maint project, but someone with immediate commit access is always better. If