On Wed, 2022-02-09 at 07:34 +, Sam James wrote:
> While we're meddling with the eclassses, could we consider fixing
> the 'locale' calls on musl? musl guarantees a UTF 8 locale (I _think_
> C.UTF-8) but the current eclass logic leads to log spam as the command
> doesn't exist on musl systems.
On 2/9/2022 02:34, Sam James wrote:
[snip]
>
> While we're meddling with the eclassses, could we consider fixing
> the 'locale' calls on musl? musl guarantees a UTF 8 locale (I _think_
> C.UTF-8) but the current eclass logic leads to log spam as the command
> doesn't exist on musl systems.
>
> be
