[gentoo-dev] Re: [RFC] Un-slotting LLVM

Hi Michał, Michał Górny writes: >> [...] >> >> Unfortunately, this ended up pretty bothersome to maintain. Besides >> making ebuilds quite complex (and prone to mistakes), I'm hearing more >> and more reports of programs being broken through getting multiple LLVM >> versions in the link chain.

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-libs/balde, net-libs/balde-markdown

# Jakov Smolić (2021-11-09) # Uses EAPI 5, no maintainer in Gentoo, no other # distro is packaging this. # Removal on 2021-12-09. Bug #819312. Bug #819321. net-libs/balde net-libs/balde-markdown -- Jakov OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

[gentoo-dev] Last rites: net-misc/ssh-chain

# Jakov Smolić (2021-11-09) # Uses EAPI 5, upstream gone, no revdeps, # no other distro is packaging this. # Removal on 2021-12-09. Bug #819303. net-misc/ssh-chain -- Jakov OpenPGP_signature Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Un-slotting LLVM

On Mon, 2021-11-08 at 12:18 +0100, Michał Górny wrote: > Hi, > > A few years back I've slotted LLVM and Clang to make the life with > revdeps easier. Long story short, every major LLVM release (which > happens twice a year) breaks API and it takes some time for revdeps to > adjust. Slotting made