Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for upcoming Bitcoin consensus protocol change (Taproot)

2021-11-04 Thread Luke Dashjr
On Friday 05 November 2021 00:44:11 Craig Andrews wrote: > As previously discussed at https://github.com/gentoo/gentoo/pull/21490 > we agreed that users would be kept informed via logs in the ebuilds and > a package mask that would be lifted before the November 16 taproot > activation date so users

Re: [gentoo-dev] News item for upcoming Bitcoin consensus protocol change (Taproot)

2021-11-04 Thread Craig Andrews
On 2021-11-04 17:59, Luke Dashjr wrote: From 2ca9bb266d18e35e0dd5d14149bb9aa7f9eae792 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Dashjr Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 21:32:55 + Subject: [PATCH] 2021-11-04-bitcoin-taproot: add news item Signed-off-by: Luke Dashjr --- Due to the sensitive nature of change

[gentoo-dev] News item for upcoming Bitcoin consensus protocol change (Taproot)

2021-11-04 Thread Luke Dashjr
From 2ca9bb266d18e35e0dd5d14149bb9aa7f9eae792 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Luke Dashjr Date: Thu, 4 Nov 2021 21:32:55 + Subject: [PATCH] 2021-11-04-bitcoin-taproot: add news item Signed-off-by: Luke Dashjr --- Due to the sensitive nature of changes to the Bitcoin consensus protocol[1], Bi

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: You currently cannot smoothly upgrade a 4 months old Gentoo system

2021-11-04 Thread Philip Webb
211104 Rolf Eike Beer wrote: > Philip Webb wrote: >> Portage error msgs are difficult to read & often simply unhelpful. > With difficult to read you mean something like "someone decided > that it's a good idea to print the blocked packages atoms > in dark blue on black and other stuff in yellow > s

Re: [gentoo-dev] Re: You currently cannot smoothly upgrade a 4 months old Gentoo system

2021-11-04 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
Philip Webb wrote: > Portage error msgs are difficult to read & often simply unhelpful. With difficult to read you mean something like "someone decided that it's a good idea to print the blocked packages atoms in dark blue on black and other stuff in yellow so it would be equally unreadable on

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-11-04 Thread Rolf Eike Beer
> My machines should actually do some useful stuff, like running my Nagios and > a bunch of nightly builds (CMake, libarchive, things like that). For that, > I'd like to have the actual system to work. Given the amount of breakage I > find when doing stabilizations I suspect this is not going to ha

Re: [gentoo-dev] [RFC] Moving more architectures to ~arch only

2021-11-04 Thread Marek Szuba
Sorry about a long delay responding, I ended up being offline until the end of last week and I've had quite a lot of catching up. Anyway, let me begin by addressing a sentiment expressed independently in several responses and which could be summarised as "just come and help". A laudable idea i

[gentoo-dev] last rites: several perl-core/*

2021-11-04 Thread Andreas K. Huettel
# Andreas K. Huettel (2021-11-04) # Unused and outdated packages; the version in core Perl is # newer. Removal in 30 days. perl-core/Module-Metadata perl-core/parent perl-core/podlators perl-core/Pod-Simple perl-core/Sys-Syslog perl-core/Term-ANSIColor -- Andreas K. Hüttel dilfri...@gentoo.org G

Re: [gentoo-dev] Common Lisp project is empty

2021-11-04 Thread Aaron W. Swenson
Michael Orlitzky writes: On Wed, 2021-11-03 at 16:25 +0100, Max Zettlmeißl wrote: On Wed, 3 Nov 2021 at 14:15, Michael Orlitzky wrote: > If no one intends to join, we should drop the following to > maintainer- > needed: I use some of those packets daily. Is there a way to join the Common