On 2021-09-28, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > On Tue, 28 Sep 2021, Michał Górny wrote:
> > On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 18:26 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> >> Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default
> >> setting,
> >> (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) info
Hi!
docker-compose upstream has apparently re-written docker-compose in
Golang from scratch. While I'm happy to keep maintaining the current
python-based =2.0.0 in Gentoo.
Thanks in advance!
Best
Sebastian
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2021, Michał Górny wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 18:26 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
>> Markers: (--) probed, (**) from config file, (==) default setting,
>> (++) from command line, (!!) notice, (II) informational,
>> (WW) warning, (EE) error, (NI) not implemented,
On Tue, 2021-09-28 at 18:26 +0200, Ulrich Mueller wrote:
> > > > > > On Tue, 28 Sep 2021, Michał Górny wrote:
>
> > The proposed new format distinguished message types both using
> > colors
> > and strings. This is roughly inspired by Xorg logs.
>
> Using the same markers as Xorg (especially [--
> On Tue, 28 Sep 2021, Michał Górny wrote:
> The proposed new format distinguished message types both using colors
> and strings. This is roughly inspired by Xorg logs.
Using the same markers as Xorg (especially [--]) but with different
meaning may be confusing though. Xorg has these:
M
I love it - this is similar to the xorg log output, and i think it makes
the portage output much cleaner and easier to read.
El mar., 28 de septiembre de 2021 11:36 a. m., Michał Górny <
mgo...@gentoo.org> escribió:
> Hi, everyone.
>
> I know I'm going to regret asking this... but I've prepared a
Hi, everyone.
I know I'm going to regret asking this... but I've prepared a change to
the Portage output format and I think it asks for a wider discussion
than internally in Portage team.
The primary problem with the current output format is that different
kinds of messages differ only in color.
On Mon, 2021-09-27 at 15:44 -0400, Mike Gilbert wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 27, 2021 at 3:11 PM Peter Stuge wrote:
> >
> > Mike Gilbert wrote:
> > > It's a waste of time and effort to pepper random ebuilds with checks
> > > for options that everyone should have enabled in the first place.
> >
> > It's
